From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QZNUn-0007VR-8B for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:29:29 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 314471C0A9; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:27:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yi0-f53.google.com (mail-yi0-f53.google.com [209.85.218.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 015CD1C0A9 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:27:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yic15 with SMTP id 15so479458yic.40 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:27:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=pezJEuwrtrS+tR7MwKrGVLQClAwbT7vErMLCM72uS/c=; b=nyorOntacrKwSYcJo+HdSI8oFHgLU+o8zHBjTaSF4BUEEqElt5htqZUEHlr/EtCnwK uTLxqFqMFM+a50vT+uSutcbUscj2KrpFtA1OWVqnzO7HqJKp7j1yfmZZJ8+Dl++47Cgc OSQHx32aIJ+CFoEib/b6c59zYEUT/1elX+ryY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=VRo2qZJs/sH30/JPV5YiHMEgHSAbVjy5b77+I4lmM3+HywmtmG0mZTVVrCFQN9oRfA V09WeKeJHlL0fFZeRc+6MexTdT4bwUYx/i6gbZaSxyy6p8YLv5lCR77o94kXjdscyA+0 Qa+6cf+R3TqM7uufdDJC8qtqWgqR1MM1ikeGI= Received: by 10.236.180.98 with SMTP id i62mr1037447yhm.403.1308749233471; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:27:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-98-95-109-99.jan.bellsouth.net [98.95.109.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w70sm309215yhl.3.2011.06.22.06.27.12 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:27:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E01EDAF.60608@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:27:11 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110606 Gentoo/2.0.14-r1 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? References: <4E0167C4.9080100@gmail.com> <4E01CF99.1070109@gmail.com> <20110622141242.7453a8e3@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20110622141242.7453a8e3@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 5b6f6aa56fa52d43232dc68d7fb358dd Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:18:49 -0500, Dale wrote: > > >> To think people wonder why my USE line is so big. I keep having to add >> stuff when portage pukes but portage never tells me when one has fell >> off the reservation and needs to be removed.< sighs> Over the years, >> it adds up. >> > That's because those are global flags. If you set package-specific flags > in /etc/portage/package.use, eix-test-obsolete will tell you when entries > can be removed. > > But when something new comes out, I usually want to add it for all the packages. I have a few things listed in package.use but I don't want to clutter the crap out of it and then have two files that needs cleaning. I have used the eix-test before but it seems to have waaaay to much output and it seems something changed and it makes less sense to me now. Maybe I need to give it another whirl and check into some output options. It'll have to wait until after garden time tho. Dale :-) :-)