From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-124530-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1QZIhe-0003CY-BH
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:22:26 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 357971C146;
	Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:20:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vergina.dyndns.org (cust-218-222.on4.ontelecoms.gr [92.118.218.222])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE35B1C140
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:20:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.1] (viper.vergina.dyndns.org [192.168.0.1])
	by viper.vergina.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F40D6E3;
	Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:20:02 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <4E01A5B2.8000108@asyr.hopto.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:20:02 +0300
From: Thanasis <thanasis@asyr.hopto.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110509 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.5
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
CC: Matthew Finkel <matthew.finkel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Do we have to build gcc with fortran now?
References: <4E0167C4.9080100@gmail.com> <4E017013.1080004@gmail.com> <4E017CDB.7070709@gentoo.org> <4E0181CA.9000203@gentoo.org> <4E018BE5.1010709@asyr.hopto.org> <4E019A71.6050403@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E019A71.6050403@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: c5639e8dd89798d46789b74da813ce54

on 06/22/2011 10:32 AM Matthew Finkel wrote the following:
> On 06/22/11 02:29, Thanasis wrote:
>> on 06/22/2011 08:46 AM justin wrote the following:
>>
>>> One little note,
>>>
>>> if portage requests that you should install dev-lang/ifc instead of
>>> gcc[fortran], you most probably have an entry
>>>
>>> sys-devel/gcc -fortran
>>>
>>> in
>>>
>>> your /etc/portage/package.use
>>>
>>> Just remove that.
>>>
>>
>> I didn't have fortran in my USE flags at all, yet portage requested to
>> install dev-lang/ifc
> 
> Was ifc pulled in as a dependency for another package?
> 

Probably not directly, but as as a fortran requirement.