From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QZH1N-0000Sf-6S for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:34:43 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 40D7E1C011; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:33:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 091ED1C011 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:33:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from paul.ibi.kfa-juelich.de (ip-62-143-16-215.unitymediagroup.de [62.143.16.215]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jlec) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C46D666A46; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:33:17 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4E018CA9.4030207@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:33:13 +0200 From: justin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:2.0b13pre) Gecko/20110620 Thunderbird/3.3a3 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? References: <4E0167C4.9080100@gmail.com> <4E017013.1080004@gmail.com> <4E017CDB.7070709@gentoo.org> <4E0181CA.9000203@gentoo.org> <4E018BE5.1010709@asyr.hopto.org> In-Reply-To: <4E018BE5.1010709@asyr.hopto.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2a1pre Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF787FE4CE328CC101392CE03" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: dd06aa3f038739c34ae249c25fa1af6e This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF787FE4CE328CC101392CE03 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 22/06/11 08:29, Thanasis wrote: > on 06/22/2011 08:46 AM justin wrote the following: >=20 >> One little note, >> >> if portage requests that you should install dev-lang/ifc instead of >> gcc[fortran], you most probably have an entry >> >> sys-devel/gcc -fortran >> >> in >> >> your /etc/portage/package.use >> >> Just remove that. >> >=20 > I didn't have fortran in my USE flags at all, yet portage requested to > install dev-lang/ifc This is a strange artifact. All my test show that gcc[fortran] should be emerged. Does it work if you manually emerge gcc with USE=3Dfortran? justin --------------enigF787FE4CE328CC101392CE03 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk4BjKoACgkQgAnW8HDreRbGdgCdHVW2VeGTlDMjrIBFVej6No83 zZ4An2kw1p6hcqhnuFl4IIGlbdK1YV6T =+0yI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF787FE4CE328CC101392CE03--