From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QZ3U8-0001yS-8J for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:07:28 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 580981C1CD for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:07:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gy0-f181.google.com (mail-gy0-f181.google.com [209.85.160.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6027F1C08A for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:14:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyd8 with SMTP id 8so2164330gyd.40 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 08:14:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sgXt5TAUMJv6k9DeYml+lxidTvedZymZwnO95huWu7g=; b=livo5K/Xs9kjNWhp5Gffy5yBu8lhnIWxdhbu9pMYFLmOCYsSm2oijDTMnoO2ta5RWg sgdW8ZFou12fG9PM+50fG56P4bJmlrX4cLla3Jj9sfEtd+a+fHPDhXRf6tSo4ilAO19w RGt7/aiV2vvs82SnwjKPzDSes1gOzRjVLARpA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=va6nmu1eIFUEwxFXB0M7/fhtgpogNIiBa+9X4qN4r6BD7606dPb4cmZgM6IUaFGWES enrMNMVNopNIQgQU8gSxnGsrKd4V9OOEF3vBqBG5Tc6IPR+6sRDjCXPFBIuYDEKvIyKw 2vnH0Mn9DdCip2i2VZaMft5tDMzyxEME4NPiE= Received: by 10.151.123.10 with SMTP id a10mr225513ybn.142.1308669262822; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 08:14:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-117-162.jan.bellsouth.net [65.0.117.162]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o2sm79484ybn.6.2011.06.21.08.14.21 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 21 Jun 2011 08:14:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E00B54C.9040006@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:14:20 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110606 Gentoo/2.0.14-r1 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] rc runlevel act strangely References: <4DFDE3DD.2050808@gmail.com> <20110620235546.04123a09@digimed.co.uk> <4DFFD325.4080409@gmail.com> <201106211602.24021.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> In-Reply-To: <201106211602.24021.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 6dd5f2f9e6a22e623623662334f6cd50 Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Tuesday 21 June 2011 00:09:25 Dale wrote: > > >> Maybe it is stable and should work. >> > It isn't, and it doesn't. It only displays one run-level per service. > > That may be why it is not documented yet then. I hope that the OP now knows to use the old way. Where ever he is. o_O Dale :-) :-)