From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-124479-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1QYnkm-00047b-Hq
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 23:19:36 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F3F5B1C0D6
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 23:19:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-gx0-f181.google.com (mail-gx0-f181.google.com [209.85.161.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50C6F1C02A
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 23:09:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by gxk9 with SMTP id 9so1262136gxk.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:09:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to
         :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=kLs3fSLOgoD0um3GciirzwvRg3GpXAjg+CkAg+lwXSU=;
        b=v1rQ7JCiPWlYcnMnvncfS1miXkLNFVBF3fOennlOxZgjBmuNjEARftIfLAlUU4R/Ds
         vG2wG0GuVr0KdgqgMjAFrs4/eLyqWAWjx8KWjn9Vx6IQN9Wkg85XI03WqJGLcoVodpSs
         DrdEGZo0+1NOM38dO5sF8fIGLNJsexHaloH7s=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=xVLVGodl4oVAOadxHtToBv1WyzrrtP/qvgfonuJAxnF8/wZBXBTl7DsUMO7eq53zH1
         6Bdr0E9NsiSos7sB2ZRmpP3PDdFIy2m8IuUM/5PnfwJcYcMa5/BVaThd0rx/5WHCXbco
         omwHjrw87rj5OjKNZ24HXdtNRHzdVVtuPmf0o=
Received: by 10.150.251.34 with SMTP id y34mr5970794ybh.354.1308611367822;
        Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:09:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-122-125.jan.bellsouth.net. [65.0.122.125])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w15sm1016767ybk.1.2011.06.20.16.09.26
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:09:27 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4DFFD325.4080409@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:09:25 -0500
From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110606 Gentoo/2.0.14-r1 SeaMonkey/2.0.14
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] rc runlevel act strangely
References: <4DFDE3DD.2050808@gmail.com>	<201106191616.41525.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org>	<4DFE17FB.2040906@gmail.com>	<201106192236.47399.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org>	<20110619214738.GA7654@linux1>	<4DFEA34C.2020501@gmail.com>	<1308588662.9971.8.camel@tux.homenetwork>	<4DFF824A.4020305@gmail.com> <20110620235546.04123a09@digimed.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20110620235546.04123a09@digimed.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: 0155203856b728f4675b331cb8ba7a0f

Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:24:26 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
>    
>> I looked on Gentoo.org but I couldn't find it documented there.  I
>> found eselect itself but nothing on the rc part.  I was curious as to
>> where the OP found it or if we have a user who actually read a man page
>> first.  O_O  Imagine that.  lol
>>      
> It was only a few days ago that eselect was discussed, with those with
> poor memories saying that they had to run it with no options to get a
> list of modules. It appears that someone looked at that list.
>
>    

I just wonder if it is ready for "primetime" since it is not 
documented?  Since the OP had trouble with it, maybe we should be doing 
it the old way because it still has a bug somewhere.

Then again, maybe the docs team is running a bit behind?  Maybe it is 
stable and should work.

This may be pointless since the OP seems to have disappeared.  lol

Dale

:-)  :-)