From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QYHp4-0005Xw-Tf for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 13:13:55 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A4971C073 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 13:13:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gw0-f53.google.com (mail-gw0-f53.google.com [74.125.83.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE7D1C044 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 12:40:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwj20 with SMTP id 20so424334gwj.40 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 05:40:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7kumCsktkO68vWVoeqYC/k+S+xZ+uwbhtDIcbgv8p40=; b=wYHSrvblVoB/FTFBl+yJgPbsnSnNnmstAUl5n3Sz3asrRSHJ0bckN/gu3wQBXohEBR azOLRdUjubWh/1vs7zVhYyOjDwmSF0Ck8FMZr4OVyimlZdVO4eFiWLC9JNTXMtrC2ufu Mbk0qv8nkwo46Ww46AvsnPBhlRDhiIyEx24Tc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=h5yk2Avwg2eYxobSWcxm98puo+NuO93pOrD5tSycYXwF5MuQUL7YlX/PSJF/si0IuV JLrDpQci34IhHy4TFQxfmc1a5TvxGRpgu0nN/m03riCXSbh4FFWf9kZynrTk1NhSj3FE 20r2Pb59DqhuyMETNXcgBfNPFPjAygwMAFDj8= Received: by 10.150.8.6 with SMTP id 6mr1639705ybh.152.1308487249352; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 05:40:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-122-125.jan.bellsouth.net. [65.0.122.125]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 41sm583168ybc.3.2011.06.19.05.40.48 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 19 Jun 2011 05:40:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DFDEE4F.9050501@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 07:40:47 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110606 Gentoo/2.0.14-r1 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] rc runlevel act strangely References: <4DFDE3DD.2050808@gmail.com> <201106191327.09491.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> In-Reply-To: <201106191327.09491.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 041641aa09a7a0045c4751e2778e6f57 Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Sunday 19 June 2011 12:56:13 =E5=88=98=E5=8B=87=E6=B3=B0 wrote: > > =20 >> After installed Gnome things, I used "eselect rc add" command to add s= ome >> init scripts into default runlevel. >> =20 > The command you should have used is "rc-update add default". > > =20 Actually, eselect is the new way. I still use the old way myself but=20 eselect should work just as well. I suspect that something failed to start and the other services depend=20 on what failed so it didn't start them. Just a theory. Dale :-) :-)