public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-user] udisks wants to downgrade udev and parted - but why?
@ 2011-06-07 15:36 Helmut Jarausch
  2011-06-07 16:07 ` Neil Bothwick
  2011-06-07 16:22 ` Daniel Pielmeier
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Helmut Jarausch @ 2011-06-07 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

Hi,

I'm puzzled again by portage's logic.

When trying to emerge sys-fs/udisks-1.0.2-r4
it wants to downgrade sys-fs/udev from 171 to 168-r2  and
sys-block/parted from 3.0 to 2.4

The udisks' ebuild contains
>=sys-fs/udev-147[extras]
>=sys-block/parted-1.8.8[device-mapper]

sys-fs/udev hasn't an 'extra' use flag and
sys-block/parted-3.0 has been emerged with the device-mapper
use flag.

But why does portage try to downgrade these to packages?

Thanks for shedding some light on this one,
Helmut.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] udisks wants to downgrade udev and parted - but why?
  2011-06-07 15:36 [gentoo-user] udisks wants to downgrade udev and parted - but why? Helmut Jarausch
@ 2011-06-07 16:07 ` Neil Bothwick
  2011-06-07 16:22 ` Daniel Pielmeier
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Neil Bothwick @ 2011-06-07 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 459 bytes --]

On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:36:08 +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote:

> sys-block/parted-3.0 has been emerged with the device-mapper
> use flag.
> 
> But why does portage try to downgrade these to packages?

parted 3.0 is now masked, it broke gparted and others

# Jeroen Roovers <jer@gentoo.org> (5 Jun 2011)
# Masked until bug #370163 is resolved.
>=sys-block/parted-3.0


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Anything worth fighting for is worth fighting dirty for.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] udisks wants to downgrade udev and parted - but why?
  2011-06-07 15:36 [gentoo-user] udisks wants to downgrade udev and parted - but why? Helmut Jarausch
  2011-06-07 16:07 ` Neil Bothwick
@ 2011-06-07 16:22 ` Daniel Pielmeier
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Pielmeier @ 2011-06-07 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 471 bytes --]

Helmut Jarausch schrieb am 07.06.2011 17:36:

> When trying to emerge sys-fs/udisks-1.0.2-r4
> it wants to downgrade sys-fs/udev from 171 to 168-r2
> 
> The udisks' ebuild contains
>> =sys-fs/udev-147[extras]
> 
> sys-fs/udev hasn't an 'extra' use flag

But sys-fs/udev-168-r2 has an extra use flag thus the dependency is
satisfied and portage wants to downgrade udev.

See bug http://bugs.gentoo.org/348472 for more information.

-- 
Daniel Pielmeier


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 262 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-06-07 16:23 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-06-07 15:36 [gentoo-user] udisks wants to downgrade udev and parted - but why? Helmut Jarausch
2011-06-07 16:07 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-06-07 16:22 ` Daniel Pielmeier

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox