From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QRWw2-0002Ms-Lo for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 21:57:10 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B13721C040; Tue, 31 May 2011 21:55:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gx0-f181.google.com (mail-gx0-f181.google.com [209.85.161.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A381C040 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 21:55:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk9 with SMTP id 9so2754691gxk.40 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 14:55:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZqMHc+MW31w+n2bnSYb2TDkU3I7X1iWQFM765NXUjgY=; b=MDJJYk3qtBncsPxMFO/FGd4e7hmj+Eb7jcvWUKIHuIP0nqVp8yN8qaPygad38QyHqJ uIwmWoVY4kSdi18YuLn+hVQw+QDLaJuASHjlX4VQDYWTRjdTG6G6lIId5NfNx8rgDlrW ZQmMAuz5eQaVls0VCos7F74umFMbhjRP96A2Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KZUXNSjUJxlITMiRXqfE+yZwy2NwDdDw249lYIcOa4RnuZq6KB8yluLVRaQRRCWS1s KrPy4UAYyTbS38AvXF9DB+OgO+E+nQRJU2KDV2RgmI6nRIRVOzrWYmCQbm25/E6gNKqC ROHcMc+CBoArHAgg3TuMsnAzhPlRTj+2SMACM= Received: by 10.150.56.38 with SMTP id e38mr5407111yba.113.1306878941951; Tue, 31 May 2011 14:55:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-98-95-108-236.jan.bellsouth.net [98.95.108.236]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s18sm196996ybg.10.2011.05.31.14.55.40 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 31 May 2011 14:55:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DE563DB.5050705@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 16:55:39 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110517 Gentoo/2.0.14 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] kde update References: <881505824.2229441306773917747.JavaMail.root@spooler5n-g27.priv.proxad.net> <4DE548DC.4020205@gmail.com> <201105312220.05779.ni1s@nerdshack.com> <201105312332.28061.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201105312332.28061.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: f0b0b00d08dec6db1e65d02dc4258e77 Alan McKinnon wrote: > Apparently, though unproven, at 22:20 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Nils Larsson did > opine thusly: > > >> tisdagen den 31 maj 2011 22:00:28 skrev Dale: >> >>> Does anyone remember the discussion I had about kde packages being in >>> the system set when doing a emerge -e system? If I for example unmerge >>> kde-meta then run --depclean, I bet I would get the error about system >>> packages being removed. It may be because of USE flags but this was >>> what I was concerned about during the last discussion. Having GUI >>> packages, especially KDE, included in the system set, even if because of >>> USE flags, is going to lead to problems at some point. >>> >>> Or maybe I am reading all this wrong? >>> >>> Dale >>> >> I assume you have "kde" enabled on sys-auth/polkit, that pulls in sys- >> auth/polkit-kde-agent and sys-auth/polkit-kde. Thats all the qt-* and >> kdelibs packages. >> > > It appears I was wrong after all. > > Manners dictates that apologies to Dale are in order. > > Sorry Dale. > > No need. I'm more worried about the heat over here. It's going to be 100F tomorrow. My poor garden is starting to cook the food as well as grow it. O_O I just need to explain it better from now on. ;-) Now, I bet there is no way to get KDE stuff out of that either. I guess one could disable the flags that pull them in but what would that take away from KDE? Then again, doesn't KDE require polkit now? If so, that can't be removed not without some teeth pulling at least. Those pesky USE flags. lol < sighs > Dale :-) :-)