From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QQM2U-0006pA-EQ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 28 May 2011 16:06:58 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A86931C0AE; Sat, 28 May 2011 16:05:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gx0-f181.google.com (mail-gx0-f181.google.com [209.85.161.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 740531C103 for ; Sat, 28 May 2011 16:05:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk9 with SMTP id 9so1491600gxk.40 for ; Sat, 28 May 2011 09:05:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nXhVChYTWtPR/6f/1Af16Gh8RZ3LVWNIomnHSl4nzic=; b=Xc1i45BAiUK5oP+nxNP1DcMRk/Oh/j3/PCOhMLrr7g39QG4KaY2DoP/l/0df1SoOYJ lLdAYG8YVl8cnkUSsr9PRxgMT8fnVpRFAoYg0g6G1cz3yqwUlpd/BzLAdyVNzQsXeKyZ 3CgydIY61973b8KXQQKaT5R6gWcc1iut6Fczs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=w5WjC3SGlt9T3k4AWcDeHFkh1ssRFqxGmc5PJdUI8pH/kL36BYhCUOdxOISvEt6wln pEWqZXYDl953xQj23vLif7whNe70Vts10Txb7GKD2A6lRj4UggXxH7acTTE7LBDQR+ct h2VBT/qYFzKxDOv8k8vRNg6IH6xSd9VS0aVrk= Received: by 10.146.66.19 with SMTP id o19mr2902113yaa.13.1306598719991; Sat, 28 May 2011 09:05:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-98-95-108-236.jan.bellsouth.net [98.95.108.236]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g30sm817649yhn.1.2011.05.28.09.05.18 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 28 May 2011 09:05:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DE11D3D.1050208@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 11:05:17 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110517 Gentoo/2.0.14 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Baselayout2/OpenRC migration question - dispatch-conf vs etc-update References: <4DE11C24.7080707@libertytrek.org> In-Reply-To: <4DE11C24.7080707@libertytrek.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 20357bf99bcb58c297097705bef1b44f Tanstaafl wrote: > Hello, > > Ok, I'm about to do the deed, but was concerned about one thing... > > The migration guide only mentions using dispatch-conf after performing > the update... > > I have only/always used etc-update for all the years I've been using > gentoo, and would really, REALLY prefer not to use a new/unfamiliar tool > during a procedure like this on a production server. > > I'm hoping that this was just a minor oversight, and that etc-update is > fully supported as pr migration? > > > I used etc-update for mine and it went well. I think that just shows the person writing the guide uses dispatch-conf. Dale :-) :-)