From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-123191-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1QPN68-0007U0-85
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 25 May 2011 23:02:40 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EEE9E1C029;
	Wed, 25 May 2011 23:01:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx.virtyou.com (mx.virtyou.com [94.23.166.77])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B13381C029
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 25 May 2011 23:01:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.2.43] (p5B275224.dip.t-dialin.net [91.39.82.36])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by mx.virtyou.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD1FE39A005
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 26 May 2011 01:01:11 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4DDD89FA.20603@wonkology.org>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 01:00:10 +0200
From: Alex Schuster <wonko@wonkology.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [HEADSUP] libreoffice versus bison-2.5
References: <gVmch-4xA-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <gWhaz-85z-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <20110525124648.GA29507@gaurahari.merseine.nu> <1971179.7VIGr59rC5@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <1971179.7VIGr59rC5@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: b4b5cde04fbb51abac71274f3466732a

Volker Armin Hemmann writes:

> This gem is a couple of years old, but still a worthy read:
> 
> http://ktown.kde.org/~seli/memory/desktop_benchmark.html
> 
> 
> Read it. Seriously.

Interesting. I'd like to also see KDE4 values :)

BTW, according to the author, the only real memory usage information
utility is Exmap. It's in portage, but when I run it (both exmtool and
gexmap, and the exmap kernel module is loaded), it outputs lots of
stuff, then aborts with 'start pgnum out of range'. Is anyone actually
using it?

	Wonko