From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-122966-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1QMjYY-0002gm-Q1
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 18 May 2011 16:25:07 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D35521C106;
	Wed, 18 May 2011 16:23:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-gy0-f181.google.com (mail-gy0-f181.google.com [209.85.160.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F2811C106
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 18 May 2011 16:23:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by gyh4 with SMTP id 4so789396gyh.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 18 May 2011 09:23:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to
         :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=z3/qhxkBMTAtqwmZ0/PLDvgMMPzLCptmr2p+ar1S4Cw=;
        b=yHEbQVk3Ki9OQ6P25aBHrKnMyMcb5A7xO5QKRCf58+3W2gjjYZgDekosZGiLxbyWnK
         JhcH5UWCqFKUZTQVhvta23T5uWFglAhnuoMg/2KlxpfKu6O9Nddhj02LhRVjKCf7XwV7
         jGoJyXCa1cs0B4QOwCgg/Xsos2bHpklDst1p8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=YMih/hpI++5ijPCEVNMNrelhNVnNetPOfy5O02Wl9UcbTVCONBnhUeshOCipnVsL/Z
         SUxNDX2D54ZgHo739rd8Aui6mdJh5pJpK36q4CZAAyHPbtVZOwf75GDbgHvKJVab9urA
         dcKO2YUIPnx6VO9BnQKOJW5DvyNstYkVAYmcQ=
Received: by 10.236.170.135 with SMTP id p7mr2318837yhl.39.1305735800888;
        Wed, 18 May 2011 09:23:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-94-119.jan.bellsouth.net [65.0.94.119])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b66sm679736yhe.17.2011.05.18.09.23.19
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Wed, 18 May 2011 09:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4DD3F276.1030407@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 11:23:18 -0500
From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110517 Gentoo/2.0.14 SeaMonkey/2.0.14
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] grub menu and the new openrc
References: <4DCFAC1F.1030101@gmail.com> <201105181428.45688.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> <4DD3D02B.8070408@gmail.com> <201105181521.57680.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org>
In-Reply-To: <201105181521.57680.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: 818934d3fc085970bff39c74f000f31d

Peter Humphrey wrote:
> My setup works just fine with run-levels that I set up years ago. I have one
> for no-x, which as well as not starting X also omits services that are only
> useful in X. I also use the nonetwork run-level for major emerges such as
> wholesale upgrades of KDE.
>
> The only thing I can think of at the moment that annoys me about open-rc is
> the loss of alphabetical ordering in the output from rc-update -s -v;
> everything else just works (well, apart from Flash in web browsers, but that
> hardly counts).
>
>    

I came in for a break.  I'm disabled so I just do a little then take a 
breather.  Whew!!  Anyway, I think it is something on my rig that is not 
right.  I'm hoping to test my old x86 rig soon.  It is a really old 
install with some really old config files.  If it works there, then I 
know it is just this install be it something specific to amd86 or just a 
setting I have that others don't.  Could the kernel affect this somehow?

Will try to reboot this rig later on.  I'll have to get a monitor and 
stuff hooked to my old x86 rig to test it.

Dale

:-)  :-)