From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QLYsl-0001DS-8E for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 15 May 2011 10:49:07 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A93F1C026; Sun, 15 May 2011 10:47:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.alltele.net (m1.alltele.net [85.30.0.4]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1774E1C026 for ; Sun, 15 May 2011 10:47:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([87.227.57.71]) by smtp.alltele.net (IceWarp 10.3.1 RC1) with ESMTP id YPK17838 for ; Sun, 15 May 2011 12:47:38 +0200 Message-ID: <4DCFAF49.2040104@coolmail.se> Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 12:47:37 +0200 From: pk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110510 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.10 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-based 'filer' / GentooFiler How-To? References: <4DCEE522.6010504@binarywings.net> <4DCFA57E.2070506@binarywings.net> In-Reply-To: <4DCFA57E.2070506@binarywings.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.77 required=7.00 tests=LOCALPART_IN_SUBJECT=1.56,RATWARE_RCVD_BONUS_SPC=1.00,MR_NOT_ATTRIBUTED_IP=0.20,NO_RDNS2=0.01,MR_DIFF_MID=1.00 version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (1.1) on smtp.alltele.net X-CTCH: RefID="str=0001.0A0B020C.4DCFAF4A.00CB,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0"; Spam="Unknown"; VOD="Unknown" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 714c394cce1f98cf4ee0e6dad8cf6c50 On 2011-05-15 12:05, Florian Philipp wrote: > BTW: Please don't top-post. Put your answers below the text you are > quoting. That makes reading longer threads easier. Yes, but putting the text below the quoted text also assumes one keeps only the relevant text (i.e. deletes all irrelevant text), which (sadly) doesn't seem to be the norm these days... Best regards Peter K