From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QKhWV-0002V4-GB for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 13 May 2011 01:50:35 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 32DD11C026; Fri, 13 May 2011 01:49:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from basement.kutulu.org (187.250.102.97.cfl.res.rr.com [97.102.250.187]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 010101C026 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 01:49:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (basement.kutulu.org [127.0.0.1]) by basement.kutulu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F1F7D8025 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 17:49:17 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at kutulu.org Received: from basement.kutulu.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (basement.kutulu.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iyesDIQATEXD for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 17:49:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.69.4] (wombat.kutulu.org [192.168.69.4]) by basement.kutulu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58AB07D8024 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 17:49:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4DCC8DFD.7020509@kutulu.org> Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 21:48:45 -0400 From: Mike Edenfield User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Will the next auto-build stage tar ball include OpenRC update? References: <20110512124315.GA27239@gaurahari> <4DCBE806.3040904@asyr.hopto.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 443dc7a7cb5711c3f06827ac54f08174 On 5/12/2011 9:27 PM, =E5=88=98=E5=8B=87=E6=B3=B0 wrote: > > > 2011/5/12 Thanasis > > > on 05/12/2011 03:43 PM Indi wrote the following: > > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 02:40:02PM +0200, Joost > Roeleveld wrote: > >> On Thursday 12 May 2011 17:12:30 dong l wrote: > >>> =E4=B8=AA=E4=BA=BA=E7=BB=8F=E5=8E=86=EF=BC=8Cbaselayout=E7=9A=84= =E6=9B=B4=E6=96=B0=E5=85=B6=E5=AE=9E=E9=83=BD=E4=B8=8D=E6=80=8E=E4=B9=88s= uffer,=E5=91=B5=E5=91=B5=EF=BD=9E > >> > >> huh? > >> > > > > It surely does look cool though, wish I could read > and write in such > > a picturesque manner. :) > > > The wonders of UTF8 ... the topic of another thread .... :) > > Can Chinese character be displayed correctly when there is > no zh* setting in LINGUAS variant? Yes. The characters you see depends on your character set,=20 not your locale. Unicode supports a huge set of Han=20 characters, assuming you have a font with those characters=20 in it. Anyone with a UTF-8 based locale should be able to=20 see the characters just fine. --Mike