From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QKX3R-0004Jb-Jd for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 14:39:53 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 940711C0EB; Thu, 12 May 2011 14:38:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vw0-f53.google.com (mail-vw0-f53.google.com [209.85.212.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A341C0EB for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 14:38:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws13 with SMTP id 13so1431003vws.40 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 07:38:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=21GK3BxwAY1VPDrv7m52ZxOZOFR0/1ZiPyi7psBpVlg=; b=VBTleW6+S+iHOK/n1UeS3XWiUtY6H4A0gfNEv4QEclprIkMY2HQWHtoeHSntow+MUZ xgR/s+h6BCZ9a7EI99iXW37WTc1C7OQkW28gFg5qfXEJIk4KOnQpojCPSKTQzC3Q89x+ mPps6AG4FEXICzeVAqHRbcKk1+3M2M0qbEJbY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=x+BfSHQ+WxvtN7adhJW0rvitacjt/vsCnLWLxlZ6w97hd9XoqFtVLI2yGdPxcWesef FcmpTEX3OX+xh9EEek4SQ7usVr+u4Yr2DrCnve7hiZ7e0Ql/Yy13j3NCRQGP2vc2OqAz qaN7J5fkrNpQopwnXu88HckIAmUj3OQ4L0c60= Received: by 10.52.108.105 with SMTP id hj9mr379870vdb.211.1305211098910; Thu, 12 May 2011 07:38:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-98-95-130-19.jan.bellsouth.net [98.95.130.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f31sm150951vcm.2.2011.05.12.07.38.16 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 12 May 2011 07:38:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DCBF0D7.1080501@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 09:38:15 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110501 Gentoo/2.0.14 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How's the openrc update going for everyone? References: <20110512125627.519370fb@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> <4DCBD875.2070209@gmail.com> <201105121525.55533.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <4DCBE4B8.4070807@gmail.com> <20110512152137.29e28325@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20110512152137.29e28325@digimed.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 491acc5610a587f1b8818a4e74d4558d Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 12 May 2011 08:46:32 -0500, Dale wrote: > > >> So, you think most of the KDE users were happy to see support for KDE3 >> being dropped, especially considering KDE4 was much less than stable? >> For me and a lot of others, it was worthless at first. It was good eye >> candy but not functional even for the little I do. >> > I didn't switch until 4.3 or 4.4, KDE 3.5 worked fine for me up until > then. It probably still works just as well now as part of the Trinity > project. > > Which supports my point. Maintain KDE3 until KDE4 is stable and usable. If it is still working, which I think it is tho some fixes have had to be made, then why couldn't KDE support KDE3 just a little while longer. Dale :-) :-)