From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QKBnD-000314-AO for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:57:43 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 97B5A1C03B; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:55:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gw0-f53.google.com (mail-gw0-f53.google.com [74.125.83.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65F171C03B for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:55:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwj20 with SMTP id 20so276963gwj.40 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 08:55:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/i4RcwZW12X73PufBlKILfPTwsHXpT1ksm9gmyFqCkQ=; b=wfTjFg38yD6Lhn95SkxVaYr+QLFX8FhhRnU4gt9ghKSq0KBOYOghjQc/HjeblP+Iyy aCyIDjHzRUSAKeYlUYP44rnk5m738f2LMVWCb2lZa7sLAw4L6O8r2sz9p3tFOTWuQZ55 3V59VUEWM+Bnc+rW/4AOZVoxfO23yiSlqUGzc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=G7ojaMS/Z8JXVgneCLijI8eJGKU/MsrJGOp28tuWu26nYRBfv3tiV5J7q3DuUXB0e7 yvVAKAvaJ/vPdrNh9WMiCfIhCDkutcMVtjB18INkpyoZJRpY78TbXk+O7QHH0MfHGueF w0RqUXTqfE/HGmN+ymqHDCHgrtYJusTk3bzNI= Received: by 10.101.152.34 with SMTP id e34mr4985001ano.108.1305129338744; Wed, 11 May 2011 08:55:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-98-95-130-19.jan.bellsouth.net [98.95.130.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q8sm112793ann.19.2011.05.11.08.55.36 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 11 May 2011 08:55:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DCAB177.8020102@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 10:55:35 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110501 Gentoo/2.0.14 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] How's the openrc update going for everyone? References: <4DC9B435.9010308@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: af0d0cf4c4beebf9c45d3ee1d343e5a0 Mark Knecht wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Dale wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> I was curious, what's the results of the openrc update for people that have >> done theirs? Is it pretty simple and "just works" or are there issues? I'm >> mostly interested in x86 and amd64 since that is what I have. Just a simple >> works here and I'm X86 or amd64 would be nice. List issues if you had any. >> >> Thanks for the feedback. >> >> Dale >> >> :-) :-) >> > Hi Dale, > I've now done 5 stable machines - 4 hardware and 1 VM. I haven't > had any significant problems on any of them. The update takes well > less that 30 minutes and, for me anyway, has been relatively pain free > compared to other historic Gentoo upgrades. > > Cheers, > Mark > > Yep. I agree. Of all the things that have caused problems in the past, this was a doozy. It had the potential to really bork a system. It appears to have been a very easy one. I don't think anyone had a REALLY big problem with this upgrade. The devs made sure all the ducks was in line on this one. Yeppie for that. Dale :-) :-)