From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QK3LT-0001GQ-AT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 06:56:31 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6CD61C0B4; Wed, 11 May 2011 06:55:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yi0-f53.google.com (mail-yi0-f53.google.com [209.85.218.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B93601C0B4 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 06:55:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yia25 with SMTP id 25so94486yia.40 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 23:55:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=tqljpqpGkDjQWRPJBDdFvifMSXEbj8RsDbqIg7N+Y74=; b=QZ75wNvm8Jh8MVVWYkMdKrB6Yt784JsBYRdDez8BICr4g1fSJzOE66HlD1YSzE2xks vNQFGDpmj0/1dDf2PtCODTrl5thZYzhyXQeCMt3XEUJnx/WYCUivU2+8RDmiV9kXyRp7 eCfepdAezay/OaJKflWGdDG1ZcyDl/94CIoy8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ma6zukinhQYRQboRtZhOiYPGdpmokvfD9C4rjK8+ifiGUbJoCxN3BsrSuCkxEbncZu kCSGcMXSveqUQYGl7cvlGduVHRDkH2BxqwYT0w101FWpMXmeqZbo+K/o877u5xybMSPo fJKCX8s8aq+agxfezHlEORxrKanzHi8jMwBvo= Received: by 10.236.78.1 with SMTP id f1mr10235777yhe.391.1305096908114; Tue, 10 May 2011 23:55:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-98-95-130-19.jan.bellsouth.net [98.95.130.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e9sm8228254ann.24.2011.05.10.23.55.06 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 10 May 2011 23:55:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DCA32C9.2030306@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 01:55:05 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110501 Gentoo/2.0.14 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] How's the openrc update going for everyone? References: <4DC9B435.9010308@gmail.com> <20110511064235.GA3093@ca.inter.net> In-Reply-To: <20110511064235.GA3093@ca.inter.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: c512bc6cd54f4178d198dec574d345bf Philip Webb wrote: > 110510 Dale wrote: > >> what's the results of the openrc update for people that have done theirs? >> > On amd64 here no problem, despite being half-asleep at the time. > It worried at the 2nd line of Init msgs that I hadn't set rc_sys , > but that was fixed when I uncommented the default "" in /etc/rc.conf . > It's still worrying at shut-down that /tmp is in use when unmounting, > but re-assures itself that Fuser can't find any offending file. > > Boot time -- 'Enter' in Lilo to login prompt in raw terminal -- > has dropped c 25 -> 15 s , a very noticeable improvement; > part of that is no delay now starting Eth0 (presumably C has replaced Bash). > > I had noticed that my eth0 was slow to start but not always. I'm not sure why it took so long but it did eventually come up. It's connected by wire to a LinkSys router and most of the time, it comes up quickly but on occasion, it decides to take a while. That is a good speed improvement. I didn't notice much difference here tho. Do you, or anyone else, have the parallel startup enabled? I started to but noticed the warning in the config file. Goes like this: "# WARNING: whilst we have improved parallel, it can still potentially lock # the boot process. Don't file bugs about this unless you can supply # patches that fix it without breaking other things! #rc_parallel="NO"" Sort of curious if anyone uses it and have had theirs to lock up during the boot up. Dale :-) :-)