From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QK29b-0000Pb-Sr for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 05:40:12 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB8411C081; Wed, 11 May 2011 05:38:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E1291C081 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 05:38:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from paul.ibi.kfa-juelich.de (ip-62-143-16-215.unitymediagroup.de [62.143.16.215]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jlec) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C719C1B4033; Wed, 11 May 2011 05:38:49 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4DCA20E1.10009@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 07:38:41 +0200 From: justin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:2.0b13pre) Gecko/20110421 Thunderbird/3.3a3 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] How's the openrc update going for everyone? References: <20110511012524.GA27712@gaurahari> <4DC9EF64.9050605@jsbc.cc> In-Reply-To: <4DC9EF64.9050605@jsbc.cc> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2a1pre Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig3D99AB9ECF51A8C5C0BFF189" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 6f04bdaa7f9569405ecfb34b9bda05a9 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig3D99AB9ECF51A8C5C0BFF189 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/05/11 04:07, Jim Burwell wrote: > On 5/10/2011 18:25, Indi wrote: >> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:20:02AM +0200, Paul Hartman wrote: >>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Dale wrote: >>>> Hi folks, >>>> >>>> I was curious, what's the results of the openrc update for people th= at have >>>> done theirs? Is it pretty simple and "just works" or are there issu= es? I'm >>>> mostly interested in x86 and amd64 since that is what I have. Just = a simple >>>> works here and I'm X86 or amd64 would be nice. List issues if you h= ad any. >>> I'm using ~amd64 and upgraded long, long, long ago. No problems at al= l >>> during or after the upgrade. I would expect it to be even smoother >>> process now than it was then. >>> >>> IIRC the biggest deal with the baselayout/openrc upgrade was that you= >>> must update a bunch of config files, which are not necessarily all >>> blind/trivial updates. Failing to update them could make rebooting a >>> sad experience. >> Same here, on x86 and ppc. Most of it was handled automatically and=20 >> the rest via dispatch-conf. Works just fine. >> > Went pretty smoothly for me following the upgrade guide. I have a > gentoo based iptables firewall with a fairly complicated network setup > with postup() functions. I made the mistake of taking out the BASH > syntax (the surrounding parens, etc) on my postup() function based on > the guide, wondering if it'd work or not, and sure enough it wanted the= > old BASH style syntax for those functions, but the new style (w/o > parens, and quoted blocks with CRs) on the "normal" sections. >=20 > They should probably make a note of this in the config guide. >=20 > It's good to see they added in support for iproute2 rules natively > instead of requiring a postup() function. I'd like to see them add a > similar functionality for adding static ARP entries too (right now usin= g > my own postup() for that). >=20 Just file a request on bugzilla. They have to know what you like to have included. justin --------------enig3D99AB9ECF51A8C5C0BFF189 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk3KIOEACgkQgAnW8HDreRbFJACfTYVm6Qjn+lQTmIKV0WDgVpah fzwAnRC08E5tjwF+qYru7lPoDlHT9+vZ =0LfE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig3D99AB9ECF51A8C5C0BFF189--