From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QEUCm-0003nD-Rx for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 22:24:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D381D1C017; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 22:23:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pw0-f53.google.com (mail-pw0-f53.google.com [209.85.160.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB411C017 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 22:23:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pwj7 with SMTP id 7so78488pwj.40 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:23:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=pa3fGlzDBTOHDyDFDtyjQyDcz+ovObx49sOUvwwEckg=; b=WGd1ErM2CcvwtBacbrBWOPIMc+mIlzPFj4WUvSOg9OXcGVS2wbAHeJMQA0zUohrwaS EMXQAI7sr+J/Hq9iUoryq+cm4v5yYZ45vO70edik6qXbQoo8bJMr7RJauG88RTfYOFRu EMo5bGq8TLvBc44CsmG+gNocvI5znQJQYn8IQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=tJIgp0zqrmEdXz24YWitpuMezqDp7ntkBcjVT4OVIC/XGpOwrIUgoDkMQ942q0LeLz NHAUYcubcTQXiq5JVGpOh66uRH6LADBmVPea++ouOHC1XPsbcfB0LXifNESsL1RSfrWG GjljGYY4d1HfNx8QfYiM5pvOUiL5BfYMvtH80= Received: by 10.143.68.19 with SMTP id v19mr694wfk.413.1303770191876; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:23:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.32.2] (110-174-198-154.static.tpgi.com.au [110.174.198.154]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k7sm4812170wfa.2.2011.04.25.15.23.09 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:23:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DB5F44B.9050005@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 08:23:07 +1000 From: Jake Moe User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110321 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.9 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT router advice] a router capable of detailed logs References: <878vv69asl.fsf@newsguy.com> <87sjt6cjvo.fsf@newsguy.com> <201104251945.16273.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201104251945.16273.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 24e9f72c6b2825e4dc297a385efddf8c I haven't followed this entire thread, but is there any chance this isn't really a "Cisco" device as you know it, but a rebranded "Linksys"? After seeing a picture of the device, and reading that it's a "Small Business" router, I'd suspect it's a device that came out of their acquisition of Linksys. That'd explain the different config style you're seeing. On 04/26/11 04:44, Mick wrote: > On Monday 25 April 2011 18:37:31 Harry Putnam wrote: >> I'm probably jumping the gun, but this RVS4000 is looking more and >> more like some pretty sorry junk to me. > I can but sympathise with your frustration. They seem to have offered a > dumbed down version of something here which is not readily recognisable as a > Cisco machine. Perhaps all this additional functionality is only available > for their professional grade platforms