From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QCp47-0005sw-ND for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 08:16:43 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 59E5F1C039; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 08:15:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vergina.dyndns.org (cust-218-222.on4.ontelecoms.gr [92.118.218.222]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 053D61C039 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 08:15:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.1] (viper.vergina.dyndns.org [192.168.0.1]) by viper.vergina.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8F2D3137 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 11:15:19 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <4DAFE797.5030307@asyr.hopto.org> Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 11:15:19 +0300 From: Thanasis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110407 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.9 ThunderBrowse/3.3.5 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Howzat! References: <201104180228.59487.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> <20110418225609.0e47a40e@digimed.co.uk> <4DAD1ECE.2000207@asyr.hopto.org> <20110419065754.D2F7C39B2@data.antarean.org> <20110419090418.00cdff45@digimed.co.uk> <4DAD7B12.6090806@asyr.hopto.org> <20110420143314.082671c3@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> <4DAF4EB5.2070201@asyr.hopto.org> <20110420230139.49fef528@digimed.co.uk> <4DAFE05B.6020804@asyr.hopto.org> <20110421090307.613d27b6@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20110421090307.613d27b6@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: e319362ea7e6666cc36e22266d521c0c on 04/21/2011 11:03 AM Neil Bothwick wrote the following: > On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 10:44:27 +0300, Thanasis wrote: > >> So, I understand that normally (in my case) there is no need for these >> presync.d and postupdate.d directories, right? >> The script could be stripped from these like so: > Correct. > > Actually, I've just noticed an inconsistency in the script, it checks for > the existence of presync.d before executing any scripts in it, but does > not do the same for postupdate.d. Thanks.