From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-121389-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1Q7oZ6-0000P0-UB
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 12:44:01 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 586EBE055D;
	Thu,  7 Apr 2011 12:41:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-gy0-f181.google.com (mail-gy0-f181.google.com [209.85.160.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D29BE055D
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu,  7 Apr 2011 12:41:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by gyh4 with SMTP id 4so1438425gyh.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 05:41:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to
         :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=q7yZRcdsJvWNI3H+2oFy0iWbTLbCqvfo7McxH2lmYP0=;
        b=SDsQRxB1atnTrrB8xh/QFnDZ57tDtBc8wUa22zEdOuf9NyuoxKa9nW+8RRKjNXtzWX
         qlCvBBif6bYbW7/X2snTKfyl1XT4sTtnP8zBL6aNmTp5UzbaIXEga5QF2Fy0vHIrc+lO
         tIyJ7FWNCqZ5oQM3WzrjTz5/36u/r0zjvlUw4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=kBmnO+o/xiXs9ZNsfkT4Rx4O9JIVGGFiBsFre7Aza4th+enF7EQszBIFgTPus/d01u
         k7kJpeM3hinATLZet8CabPTsJzANh4Nq0K1O0foYEtTlvNVvar0h3BG9TEn64Os2fzsS
         PkwApmjutNWTU1c+9EQmYL21iHB/S89ZoVJ+M=
Received: by 10.91.67.3 with SMTP id u3mr727867agk.86.1302180114166;
        Thu, 07 Apr 2011 05:41:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-0-118-199.jan.bellsouth.net [65.0.118.199])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r8sm1802839ane.19.2011.04.07.05.41.52
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Thu, 07 Apr 2011 05:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4D9DB10F.20806@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 07:41:51 -0500
From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.18) Gecko/20110325 Gentoo/2.0.13 SeaMonkey/2.0.13
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] LVM for data drives but not the OS
References: <gEUDo-72k-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <gEVzt-b2-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <gEVJ8-ou-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <20110407121530.GA29890@pacific.net.au>
In-Reply-To: <20110407121530.GA29890@pacific.net.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: 77563dacc5f47c0169ccc98699c9e40e

Gregory Shearman wrote:
> In linux.gentoo.user, you wrote:
>    
>> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>      
>>> On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 05:22:41 -0500, Dale wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>>>> I want to do it this way because I don't trust LVM enough to put my OS
>>>> on.  Just my personal opinion on LVM.
>>>>
>>>>          
>>> This doesn't make sense. Your OS can be reinstalled in an hour or two,
>>> your photos etc. are irreplaceable.
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>> It does to me.  I want to keep things so that if there is a problem, I
>> know how to fix it or can at least get to a point that I can get help on
>> it.  If LVM fails and I can't boot, then I loose everything on LVM
>> because I would have to reinstall from scratch.  If it fails just on my
>> data stuff, I can get help and fix it because I can still boot up and
>> get to my email program.  Also, I have the important stuff backed up to
>> DVD.  I would only loose things that I can download again.  I would just
>> rather avoid that and I'm sure AT&T would agree.  That's a lot of
>> downloading.
>>      
> I have all my partitions on LVM except the boot partition. I've used LVM
> for more years than I could count and have *never* had a failure related
> to LVM.
>
> I backup my machines to an external drive (2 backup drives actually)
> using rsync.
>
> If I have a failure and cannot boot then I just put in my Gentoo Minimal
> CD (which has all the LVM tools available) and I can fix the damage. If
> the damage isn't fixable then I can just copy over the backups.
>
> LVM snapshots make live backups a breeze. Backups are always in a
> consistent state and I've tested them and they *work*.
>
>    

If you know how to do that, then that works.  Right now, I have no 
experience with LVM.  All I know is what I have read which is about as 
clear as mud.  ;-)

Dale

:-)  :-)

P. S.  I wonder why this reply was not threaded with the rest?  I see 
this happen sometimes with other threads.  Always been curious about that.