From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4rs8-0004K0-KT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:39:28 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D60F91C05F; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:37:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-f53.google.com (mail-yw0-f53.google.com [209.85.213.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A75321C05F for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:37:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywl2 with SMTP id 2so548469ywl.40 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 02:37:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0TQmReKk5vZhK8FA+qZvA9h9x5e2SxGf2jH/15REJPo=; b=o37rotJrhvOO8dpkZA9cB821chTwr268ZrPn43Yrr8l+hhIMNsIK/tYo0ESGwTb6+S pebAmBJJHZ0GtSnZCBmdEKKJ2uZMSZny/Fjv37BvaLlSlCubeUqVrDpH8cvTzypKy/Ju W/GoXazLNBGzkNl/U5yr9O+31kUv8ykKaSPPM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=VCLsa2q8EHHG4J86k8MA+vs6v7/TvyUk8sZ1LHhWA8JQaBZCSHKXkLd5pTSehqMPGz /ZSep/N3Qa2Zp9Zj/zFEPgEKE8FQdYapW1B75BZa++YwuR8AVZhvHxZQ8PTKhvNxAS/F IIvgDvP1bZKuRxJL+Wb3AISnuDAd7u8zxkaXk= Received: by 10.91.21.26 with SMTP id y26mr1250278agi.187.1301477868064; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 02:37:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-95-130-79.jan.bellsouth.net [98.95.130.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w39sm3327005ana.13.2011.03.30.02.37.46 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 30 Mar 2011 02:37:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4D92F9E9.4040600@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 04:37:45 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.18) Gecko/20110325 Gentoo/2.0.13 SeaMonkey/2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer vs mplayer2 References: <4D91F44B.9020104@gmail.com> <4D92E321.7050101@cox.net> <32126.1301474147@ccs.covici.com> <4D92F458.9050200@cox.net> In-Reply-To: <4D92F458.9050200@cox.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 4a084444f3b4d69945632be95e3235ca John Campbell wrote: > On 03/30/2011 01:35 AM, covici@ccs.covici.com wrote: > >> I am not seeing mplayer2 in the tree -- unless it came in the last day >> or so -- and which config takes the threads=5 parameter? > > It's in the multimedia overlay. > > The "threads=#" (where # less than total threads available on > processor) parameter goes in the ~/.mplayer/config file. I've only > got 4 processors so I set it to threads=4. You have an i7, so it > should handle more. > > I have it in the tree here: [-P-] [M~] media-video/mplayer2-2.0 (0) [-P-] [M ] media-video/mplayer2-9999 (0) They are masked but it is there. Is that the same one? While I am at it, is the plain mplayer going to be phased out and the new mplayer2 take its place? Dale :-) :-)