From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4RWK-0003yn-MN for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 05:31:12 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 231A71C09B; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 05:29:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gy0-f181.google.com (mail-gy0-f181.google.com [209.85.160.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E99791C09B for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 05:29:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyh4 with SMTP id 4so1624035gyh.40 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 22:29:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=f+IjGrJoZbmFq1wrO5ZM1cupHMmB13ctrTsuzVzEijE=; b=n+X2AiT2me2K64oqcA5ePK62svQHInHuOA/S2ni/RrUzkLL7gpdUaokQ7w6dJhG89H H5ObOAxmS9JLtIbd4PjjGWkYg6VjEHo3KOmmbfCD48XEQcKPE+moui5XKfVeLbaZorRz 3u+EPuZ8PCd/EqOWGsuc+nVjhbxJOhLrfT2ss= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=MH1IovI+u+AMS8cb49jGOwH6Na34Uqa0LJMQp+PXObFhewx6SMaOLVTROHa8si3uHB jV3XTrmxuhTEUHRi7gEgQl4+uhdEjeDHj5uSXk8VUMw6q7rB+LP5/TQS95BWQ64wPHKR 5PSsOB5b0qt4rrP73cuZgSGmVaU1jePONey3w= Received: by 10.90.132.6 with SMTP id f6mr4809494agd.56.1301376584084; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 22:29:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-95-130-79.jan.bellsouth.net [98.95.130.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c38sm2017095anc.44.2011.03.28.22.29.42 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 28 Mar 2011 22:29:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4D916E44.3060007@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:29:40 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.18) Gecko/20110325 Gentoo/2.0.13 SeaMonkey/2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: New bugzilla has broken search? References: <4D915BF8.404@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: e014ad85614a05e1a09ecbebf4c56aca Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 03/29/2011 07:11 AM, Dale wrote: >> Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >>> Either I'm doing something wrong, or the new bugzilla version at >>> bugs.gentoo.org really sucks at searching. Let's for example go here: >>> >>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/query.cgi?format=specific >>> >>> and select "All" for "Status". Then search for "kde-base/kdelibs". It >>> takes a *lot* of time to complete, and worse, it returns a hell of a >>> lot of results that have nothing whatsoever to do with the search >>> query. >>> >>> Did no one else notice? >>> >>> >> >> I went to the link and just typed in "kdelibs". They look relevant to >> me. They all had kdelibs in it anyway. I was to lazy to type in the rest >> since I also don't think it is needed. I mean, kdelibs is unique, no >> other package has that name that I know of. Maybe the "/" throws it off >> or something. >> >> Maybe your bug search skills are like my google search skills. lol >> Please take that as a joke. :-) > > You missed the select "All" for "Status" part. > I did select "all" and it seems to work fine with the way I searched. At the bottom of one huge list, it says this: "3097 bugs found" Looks like a lot to me. If I don't do "all", it only finds 84. Those would be open bugs since that is the default. Dale :-) :-)