From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Q3AC0-00015p-PD for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:48:57 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E2AA1C05A; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:46:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-f53.google.com (mail-yw0-f53.google.com [209.85.213.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AF161C05A for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:46:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywl2 with SMTP id 2so672302ywl.40 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 09:46:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=G59CCKKRi23lQzoajtYmlX0zIyB0xD03quM42zFLKr8=; b=lbswDoZ4+3v3ebxYWK/2berhxWoZjmKPXneJCY2fZKAFjgJ4JrqmJpHXg/tHK9gDGU HUeTzQz7CPbvv3FmpVAcOsGY+jj/OCJkc703lZPo9YlEe6H37AWUmjsG/iMMDT2aSiJ6 fpjI11S9/5Yu0dgC2FtAQxXf3xzuZ+sHnaDBY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=lcz+H4YGUlW1lcfbZ3Q+QFa3rHnzP4NK6ptLl/332ajC3OpAKt2QlsfffH1N1pyKnl 9wXc4Qdk8GRwdFKuuQ+OpA3NJJrgFDGS3mIa/XMFpQUVgRcmEYtTEz0F0A42e9rfOGmu LqVMhkDOsegcmmwSZyBZJRvD089vA2HGtIZT0= Received: by 10.150.230.3 with SMTP id c3mr1177310ybh.88.1301071586722; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 09:46:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-0-90-60.jan.bellsouth.net [65.0.90.60]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t16sm617638ybe.19.2011.03.25.09.46.24 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 25 Mar 2011 09:46:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4D8CC6DF.5090204@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:46:23 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.17) Gecko/20110321 Gentoo/2.0.12 SeaMonkey/2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] python-2.7 && python-updater References: <4D8BE1B3.80807@gmail.com> <4D8C624B.3090100@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 683106205cdade19c764cac05d5b9661 Paul Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Dale wrote: > >> Paul Hartman wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Dale wrote: >>> >>> >>>> And if we should set python to 2.7, should we remove python-2.6? I don't >>>> think we want to break something, portage in particular. ;-) >>>> >>>> >>> I have no trace of python-2.6 on my system at this point and I'm >>> getting along just fine with 2.7 as my active python. >>> >>> >>> >> Out of curiosity, how long you, or someone else, been using python 2.7? You >> emerged a few packages with no issues so far? I'm sort of skidish on >> anything other than minor updates to python. If I mess it up, portage may >> bite me. o_O We all know a broken portage is not a good thing. >> > For about a week or two, no problems so far. > > If you switch to 2.7 then run python-updater before removing 2.6, you > should be fine. If you take a binpkg of it first you can have some > extra peace of mind. > > I have buildpkg in make.conf. I keep a copy of everything installed on here, just in case I get to stupid one day. We all have those days right? Thanks. Dale :-) :-)