From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Q33UN-0006Gi-9b for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 09:39:27 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B3D1B1C072; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 09:37:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gw0-f53.google.com (mail-gw0-f53.google.com [74.125.83.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84CFF1C072 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 09:37:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwj20 with SMTP id 20so3544gwj.40 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 02:37:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LaDHYOBpFeuMjBsvLAxfmYBW75L9A7pE0iDhY6csB9k=; b=VL6T2NPz5NlqJ5VfTaVki/Rbc//6zhZHFGI5pY6HKFPNBgpRdQhW4fumxPGJA5PY19 aG46iq3+C+kkdhaM9Pq1GWWvAZ/Mv6fvHfAkKZyUXksVDEWOzM7afR8fm30GerOFG3Pp ok5XvELgjNO3GgB2BfKZWzSE6fuIr5WZIMa6I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Xac3wTl346vv5uj/FPNmZ2t9uzMa2mrxa1xtR1MJ798lSKZrYSxq4pdh3O9tiPK4w9 R1hQo77ISd/qkrpS4lU0SjTJ6Nti2JS9hWgblcSu8xhrs8/ajDHtqpgMwDv8mwfzIxxj c/F4pSt8/0hrdi7MDgqePnXXKripP6PMIRRIk= Received: by 10.150.147.15 with SMTP id u15mr671287ybd.327.1301045837832; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 02:37:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-0-90-60.jan.bellsouth.net [65.0.90.60]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x37sm885204ana.34.2011.03.25.02.37.16 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 25 Mar 2011 02:37:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4D8C624B.3090100@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 04:37:15 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.17) Gecko/20110321 Gentoo/2.0.12 SeaMonkey/2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] python-2.7 && python-updater References: <4D8BE1B3.80807@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: f7e8b5497e59c1303a789fe5e185305e Paul Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Dale wrote: > >> And if we should set python to 2.7, should we remove python-2.6? I don't >> think we want to break something, portage in particular. ;-) >> > I have no trace of python-2.6 on my system at this point and I'm > getting along just fine with 2.7 as my active python. > > Out of curiosity, how long you, or someone else, been using python 2.7? You emerged a few packages with no issues so far? I'm sort of skidish on anything other than minor updates to python. If I mess it up, portage may bite me. o_O We all know a broken portage is not a good thing. Thanks. Dale :-) :-)