* [gentoo-user] Given the rough end of the pineapple by liblzma.so.0
@ 2011-02-06 15:09 Andrew Lowe
2011-02-06 17:57 ` Mike Gilbert
2011-02-06 18:15 ` Neil Bothwick
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Lowe @ 2011-02-06 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Hi all,
I'm updating my machine and things were going well until something died
and I got a big long list of reports. You know the ones, that emerge
spits out after each package compiles and tells you to run
etc-update/revdep-rebuild/gcc-config etc. Anyway, one of them was from:
app-arch/xz-utils-5.0.1
telling me to run revdep-rebuild:
# revdep-rebuild --library '/usr/lib64/liblzma.so.0'
and then delete liblzma
# rm '/usr/lib64/liblzma.so.0'
Being a good boy, I did as I was told, ran revdep-rebuild then rm, had a
bit of a fiddle round to try and fix the thing that caused the initial
death and then kicked off the emerge world again. This is where the fun
now begins. Now kdelibs-4.6.0-r1 can't find liblzma.so.0. The building
of kdelibs now fails with:
cmake: error while loading shared libraries: liblzma.so.0: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory
I had a look in /usr/lib and found:
*********************
bluey lib # ls -la liblzma*.*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 911 Feb 6 22:14 liblzma.la
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Feb 6 22:14 liblzma.so -> liblzma.so.5.0.1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Feb 6 22:14 liblzma.so.5 -> liblzma.so.5.0.1
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 141592 Feb 6 22:14 liblzma.so.5.0.1
bluey lib #
*********************
No .0, which, as you would remember from before, I've deleted. So what
do I do now. I attempted to reinstall xz-utils but nothing changed. Do I
need to install an old version of xz-utils? Do I just do a sym link from
liblzma.so.5.0.1 to .0 and all will be well. Anyone got any ideas?
Any thoughts greatly appreciated,
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Given the rough end of the pineapple by liblzma.so.0
2011-02-06 15:09 [gentoo-user] Given the rough end of the pineapple by liblzma.so.0 Andrew Lowe
@ 2011-02-06 17:57 ` Mike Gilbert
2011-02-07 15:47 ` Andrew Lowe
2011-02-06 18:15 ` Neil Bothwick
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mike Gilbert @ 2011-02-06 17:57 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Andrew Lowe <agl@wht.com.au> wrote:
> telling me to run revdep-rebuild:
>
> # revdep-rebuild --library '/usr/lib64/liblzma.so.0'
Did it tell you to give the full path the liblzma or just the library
name "liblzma.so.0"? I suspect this is where you went astray.
Anyway, a simple "revdep-rebuild" with no options should fix your
system; you have removed the offending library, so it should detect
the breakage automatically.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Given the rough end of the pineapple by liblzma.so.0
2011-02-06 17:57 ` Mike Gilbert
@ 2011-02-07 15:47 ` Andrew Lowe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Lowe @ 2011-02-07 15:47 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 07/02/11 01:57, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Andrew Lowe<agl@wht.com.au> wrote:
>> telling me to run revdep-rebuild:
>>
>> # revdep-rebuild --library '/usr/lib64/liblzma..so.0'
>
> Did it tell you to give the full path the liblzma or just the library
> name "liblzma.so.0"? I suspect this is where you went astray.
>
> Anyway, a simple "revdep-rebuild" with no options should fix your
> system; you have removed the offending library, so it should detect
> the breakage automatically.
>
Tried Neil's lafilefixer, but unfortunately it didn't fix the problem.
Mike's revdep_rebuild itself didn't fix the problem but did identify
that libarchive was not in the best of health. A manual emerge of
libarchive appears to have now fixed the problem.
Thanks gentlemen for the suggestions,
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Given the rough end of the pineapple by liblzma.so.0
2011-02-06 15:09 [gentoo-user] Given the rough end of the pineapple by liblzma.so.0 Andrew Lowe
2011-02-06 17:57 ` Mike Gilbert
@ 2011-02-06 18:15 ` Neil Bothwick
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Neil Bothwick @ 2011-02-06 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 750 bytes --]
On Sun, 06 Feb 2011 23:09:09 +0800, Andrew Lowe wrote:
> bluey lib # ls -la liblzma*.*
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 911 Feb 6 22:14 liblzma.la
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Feb 6 22:14 liblzma.so ->
> liblzma.so.5.0.1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Feb 6 22:14
> liblzma.so.5 -> liblzma.so.5.0.1 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 141592 Feb 6
> 22:14 liblzma.so.5.0.1 bluey lib #
>
> *********************
>
> No .0, which, as you would remember from before, I've deleted. So what
> do I do now. I attempted to reinstall xz-utils but nothing changed. Do
> I need to install an old version of xz-utils? Do I just do a sym link
> from liblzma.so.5.0.1 to .0 and all will be well. Anyone got any ideas?
Start with lafilefixer --justfixit
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-02-07 16:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-02-06 15:09 [gentoo-user] Given the rough end of the pineapple by liblzma.so.0 Andrew Lowe
2011-02-06 17:57 ` Mike Gilbert
2011-02-07 15:47 ` Andrew Lowe
2011-02-06 18:15 ` Neil Bothwick
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox