From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1PiXkR-0001d4-QB for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 19:43:16 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 49248E0B60; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 19:41:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vw0-f53.google.com (mail-vw0-f53.google.com [209.85.212.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E7BE0B60 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 19:41:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws8 with SMTP id 8so1010427vws.40 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:41:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XRfaoKeCkHddytMhoyW3L+yYP0Hug8OlM1uUMMH27TI=; b=nGJ2s1dFSQ5uG3Zdp97tkSbUNhraqG/a101yrQhw5lzUwzNw5htvLHn2Vf3xw+Y681 tAdtaIMjD/uydeEFuIKwkpJaG8aM1m+DZOzAtiXMUBRMvBnvmw555MQBgcc4I//7siY3 1gj1FoYYXaH0LnJRswrNwkUl8edJvxL/+luZ4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=WK68dwATkvIfyFZprS3IOSLqlwbMQnOp3AnuDHHGcevfwj2F3aSRNun93f9XKNIAqf w636qjBxM3YKes9jhehBwpASfX83wKrvif9Rpge3pBJoUCtOSCuYREPCbNs4j6WLOqK3 1NruB9+EAegfxmeT6YpZPzkmHOB5Vcn5cf/oU= Received: by 10.220.193.193 with SMTP id dv1mr371487vcb.212.1296157307440; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:41:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-0-95-40.jan.bellsouth.net [65.0.95.40]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k39sm5711260vcr.2.2011.01.27.11.41.45 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:41:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D41CA78.6020109@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:41:44 -0600 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101212 Gentoo/2.0.11 SeaMonkey/2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Simultaneously emerging multiple packages with same dependencies References: <20110127140525.GA4844@ksp.sk> <201101271512.50141.joost@antarean.org> <20110127181325.GA26616@ksp.sk> In-Reply-To: <20110127181325.GA26616@ksp.sk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 5ec9f426b69261bfcd2bcd7c88fcd6e6 YoYo Siska wrote: > Yes. > It might not be perfect, but mostly it works pretty well. > Once make started 10 or so process, which ate all my ram, because I > forgot to reenable swap, when I was playing with something before that > :) > > yoyo > I noticed the same thing with mine. It used a LOT of ram. I have 4Gbs and it was up to about 3Gbs at one point and using some swap as well. I'm hoping to max out to 16Gbs as soon as I can. May upgrade to a 6 core CPU too. I wonder how much faster it would be if the work directory is put on tmpfs? With 16Gbs, that should work even for OOo. Dale :-) :-)