From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-119083-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1Pg36a-0004xs-EW
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 22:35:48 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 897A0E0A6F;
	Thu, 20 Jan 2011 22:34:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail2.viabit.com (mail2.viabit.com [65.246.80.16])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59BF7E0A6F
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 22:34:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.1.1.204] (unknown [65.213.236.244])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail2.viabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A839737ADA
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:34:01 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4D38B859.9060802@orlitzky.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:34:01 -0500
From: Michael Orlitzky <michael@orlitzky.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110108 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.7
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Rail Model font for coders
References: <3948.86.19.224.122.1295514868.squirrel@lavabit.com>	<iha6nj$9o3$1@dough.gmane.org> <871v47rzwm.fsf@ist.utl.pt>
In-Reply-To: <871v47rzwm.fsf@ist.utl.pt>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: 4469841eeb9a7dcd4fd68eb3c458814e

On 01/20/11 17:08, Nuno J. Silva wrote:
> Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de> writes:
> 
>> On 01/20/2011 11:14 AM,
>> hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_hare@lavabit.com
> 
> I am against hard limits on username lengths, but I think that
> uuencoding the result of gzipping that address yelds a more readable
> address.

Fun fact (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5321#section-4.5.3.1.1):

  4.5.3.1.1.  Local-part

     The maximum total length of a user name or other local-part is 64
     octets.