From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N8w0R-0003MK-2b for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:16:03 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E87DE092B; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:16:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailc.rambler.ru (mailc.rambler.ru [81.19.66.27]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39B93E0921 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:16:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from IgorS (unknown [213.221.53.193]) (Authenticated sender: igwasm@rambler.ru) by mailc.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34915621C7F for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:16:00 +0300 (MSK) Message-ID: <4D128FBA6AA349C0A59E9BA2586A4994@IgorS> From: "igwasm" To: References: <200911121429.09304.igwasm@rambler.ru> <200911131226.24268.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> <200911131408.46857.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <200911131408.46857.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ati drivers. Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:16:01 +0300 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8"; reply-type=original X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: eb222da9-b2fc-4ba6-9dd0-fa043a874d5a X-Archives-Hash: de9457fc62d3156d619300232d3807f5 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Volker Armin Hemmann" To: Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 4:08 PM Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ati drivers. On Freitag 13 November 2009, igwasm wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Volker Armin Hemmann" > To: > Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 2:26 PM > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ati drivers. > > On Freitag 13 November 2009, Igor wrote: > > =D0=92 =D1=81=D0=BE=D0=BE=D0=B1=D1=89=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D0=B8 =D0=BE=D1= =82 =D0=9F=D1=8F=D1=82=D0=BD=D0=B8=D1=86=D0=B0 13 =D0=BD=D0=BE=D1=8F=D0=B1= =D1=80=D1=8F 2009 05:38:24 =D0=B0=D0=B2=D1=82=D0=BE=D1=80 Nikos Chantziar= as > > > > =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB: > > > On 11/12/2009 11:55 PM, Igor wrote: > > > > =D0=92 =D1=81=D0=BE=D0=BE=D0=B1=D1=89=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D0=B8 =D0= =BE=D1=82 =D0=9F=D1=8F=D1=82=D0=BD=D0=B8=D1=86=D0=B0 13 =D0=BD=D0=BE=D1=8F= =D0=B1=D1=80=D1=8F 2009 00:30:35 =D0=B0=D0=B2=D1=82=D0=BE=D1=80 Volker Ar= min > > > > Hemmann > > > > > > > > =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB: > > > >> [...] > > > >> yeah, unpacking in /usr/portage is completly wrong. Just follow = the > > > >> instructions. > > > > > > > > I strictly follow the instructions. But "emerge: there are no=20 > > > > ebuilds > > > > to satisfy "=3Dx11-base/xorg-server-1.6.3.901-r99"." > > > > > > Volker's instructions work, but the overlay method is more complica= ted > > > than it needs to be. You can find an easier method of applying the > > > patch here: > > > > > > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-794699.html > > > > > > This has the benefit that it works with all versions of X.Org and n= ot > > > just with 1.6.3 and you don't need a custom ebuild in your local > > > overlay. > > > > > > Note that the patch we're talking about does *not* fix the CPU load= on > > > moving windows; ati-drivers are just too slow with this operation. = It > > > only fixes the resizing, maximizing and opening of new windows. > > > > Thank you. But i have question about this patch. Why ati driver is ve= ry > > slow in X.Org? Is it bug ati driver or X.Org? > > > > > >as I wrote before, 'they' changed X a long time ago for intel drivers = and > >screwed over everybody else. So it is X fault - but X devs put the=20 > >fingers > >in > >their ears, say it is everybody's else fault and sing lalala. > > I really don`t understand this. X have spec and all must use it. X don`= t > must use spec of intel. If X change spec then all must change drivers.=20 > Open > source driver work fine. > >that has nothign to do with spec and how to use uninitialised memory. Hm. Is it undoc hack in X? Could i see this diff in code? I want use it i= n=20 other distrs linux.