From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1PIhpx-000581-6i for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 13:14:09 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 98177E0959; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 13:13:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from darkmetatron.de (darkmetatron.de [85.214.105.42]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E442E0959 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 13:13:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.126] (xdsl-87-79-150-21.netcologne.de [87.79.150.21]) by darkmetatron.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D7C5838EC050 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 14:13:38 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4CE3D500.1010105@darkmetatron.de> Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 14:13:36 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?U2ViYXN0aWFuIEJlw59sZXI=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101105 Lightning/1.0b3pre Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Crufted with perl modules? References: <20101117020359.GA9235@math.princeton.edu> <4ce39e24.HypTlXXw8UackkUN%Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> <4CE3CFF6.5090602@darkmetatron.de> <1289998487.3062.0.camel@WOPR> In-Reply-To: <1289998487.3062.0.camel@WOPR> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 3a57df11-b7ca-4dfc-a0ec-5ecd347909dd X-Archives-Hash: cb4a715976bd08d272df805b98c3af70 Am 17.11.2010 13:54, schrieb Albert Hopkins: > On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 13:52 +0100, Sebastian Be=C3=9Fler wrote: >> Am 17.11.2010 10:19, schrieb Joerg Schilling: >> >>> This is why find -exec + exists since 20 years. >> >> Could you enlighten me about this? >> I look into man find but it says nothing about -exec + or a + operator >> at all. Also adding + to the command doesn't work either. >> > > Which man page are you looking at? It's in my find man page at least. > > man find Aktionen -exec Kommando; f=C3=BChrt das Kommando aus; die Aktion ist wahr, wenn das Kommando eine= n=20 Status von Null liefert; alle auf den Kommandonamen folgenden=20 Argumente bis zu einem Semikolon ; werden als Kommandozeilenargumente=20 f=C3=BCr das Kommando interpretiert; das Semikolon kann nicht weggelassen= =20 werden, und es muss durch mindestens ein Whitespace von der letzten=20 Option getrennt werden; die Konstruktion {} wird durch den Pfadnamen=20 der Datei ersetzt; die Klammern und das Semikolon m=C3=BCssen in der=20 Kommandozeile f=C3=BCr find quotiert werden, damit sie nicht von der Shel= l=20 bearbeitet werden There is only one -exec option explained, no + to see. The only option with a + in my manpage is -perm +Modus No I have not tried the english version, I thought that a option that=20 exists for 20 years should be in translated manpages too. The last line of the manpage says: LunetIX Linuxhandbuch 1.Juli 1993 FIND(1) so it is newer then 20 years but not much. That really should be updated.