From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-116334-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1PFFHY-0002uB-Cm
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 00:08:20 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F2FEE09F4;
	Mon,  8 Nov 2010 00:07:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-yx0-f181.google.com (mail-yx0-f181.google.com [209.85.213.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E7BFE09F4
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon,  8 Nov 2010 00:07:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by yxn35 with SMTP id 35so4287026yxn.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 07 Nov 2010 16:07:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from
         :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=1Vwpgp0vvg3pkSOhr99q9pjYR0IV7ldCQgaPYDA4i9E=;
        b=kkhKXptleHsRHnZXrLGKPMAe90V2o/oukc1qkfgdFyDsoWTUqF4ARqiSE7kW01AYJ3
         kJZy2uTt6hjAIr0HhpgD304dtpxd8jGOsDAEXlhxkjj0LW3a5cDVeoBg07HUZ327jqQo
         JwldwXXkju5VWqDGLjT5mIGF295CFCIHj8LhI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=bZYT8Mgn183psAGjdDhikDe6v4ZqujeURQhUszxMpd8jAIg0eVj8Kr9a7tjgTkEqHC
         +QNLb5NOlyrIIKM1bKNbaSBXnPdYKcl2fWwdA4UuOp2hlSPdVLMrsC7IoX5r/Mh2rx8R
         7Q7/9em5syeB7e9KodaTz8/WUSNiKDwt5p7Nc=
Received: by 10.91.27.32 with SMTP id e32mr4502677agj.37.1289174868070;
        Sun, 07 Nov 2010 16:07:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (adsl-0-121-224.jan.bellsouth.net [65.0.121.224])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i37sm2014665anh.34.2010.11.07.16.07.46
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Sun, 07 Nov 2010 16:07:47 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4CD73F51.8030605@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2010 18:07:45 -0600
From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101028 Gentoo/2.0.10 SeaMonkey/2.0.10
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Upgrading from FX-5200 to a GeForce 6200 512MB
References: <4CBD4C85.2010500@gmail.com> <4CC7D7EB.8060606@gmail.com> <4CD56E24.2060403@gmail.com> <201011070306.11120.robin.atwood@attglobal.net>
In-Reply-To: <201011070306.11120.robin.atwood@attglobal.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: a7115654-1010-4269-8e5c-d7393dd387cc
X-Archives-Hash: 568c5617316c14d04dd945b4fbcfceef

Robin Atwood wrote:
> On Saturday 06 November 2010, Dale wrote:
>    
>> Dale wrote:
>>      
>    
>> This is getting weird.  I haven't rebooted in a few weeks now.  I tried
>> to watch a video a bit ago and it was slow again.  It was down to about
>> 2 or 3 frames per second.  It is awful.  If I go tell it to switch to
>> opengl, it gets fast again but after a while it will go back to being
>> really slow.  Why do I have to keep telling it to use nvidia's opengl
>> when it says it is using it and I have switched to a few times?  If it
>> is using it, why does it slow down until I tell it to switch?
>>
>> I did do a huge KDE upgrade the other day.  I don't recall seeing
>> anything else X related being updated but I could have missed something
>> in that LONG list.  I did do a baselayout upgrade and portage itself has
>> been upgraded a few times.
>>
>> Any ideas on why this thing keeps doing this?  Would a reboot even help
>> in this situation?
>>      
> When it gets very slow start up top and see what's using the CPU. My bet is
> the Xserver. I have a GeForce 9400 GT 512MB and the xserver will happily use
> 90% while nothing much is happening. Start a KDE4 app which constantly updates
> (ktorrent, kps are good 3rd party examples) and the xserver goes crazy.
>
> HTH
> -Robin
>    

Nope, it wasn't that here.  This is what top says:

   PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND
17995 root      20   0 45360  15m 3360 R 89.6  0.7   0:35.72 glxgears
32113 dale      20   0  305m 162m  27m S  3.3  8.0  17:56.38 seamonkey-bin
31796 root      20   0  187m  76m  30m S  2.0  3.8  21:51.94 X
31914 dale      20   0  286m  47m  24m S  1.7  2.3  18:04.02 kwin

It was glxgears that was taking up the most CPU time but I think the 
rest of it was processing the video.  Thing is, nothing has been updated 
and I have not even logged out of KDE since it was working this 
morning.  So, without me doing a single thing, it has stopped working as 
it should.  It's like the card is being bypassed as far as it using its 
own CPU to process the picture.

Oh, look at this miserable mess:

2 frames in 8.5 seconds =  0.236 FPS
2 frames in 8.7 seconds =  0.230 FPS
2 frames in 8.3 seconds =  0.241 FPS
2 frames in 8.1 seconds =  0.246 FPS
2 frames in 8.1 seconds =  0.247 FPS
2 frames in 8.1 seconds =  0.247 FPS
2 frames in 8.3 seconds =  0.241 FPS

Trust me, to see those little wheels turn that slow is really boring.

Going back to single user and switch this again.  I have noticed that 
telling it to switch to nvidia's opengl while in single user mode does 
seem to last longer.  Going to re-emerge the drivers to while I am at 
it.  Can't hurt anything.

Still open to ideas cause this is weird.

Dale

:-)  :-)