From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-115871-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1P9b0E-000736-Py for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 10:07:06 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E9E8E081F for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 10:07:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gw0-f53.google.com (mail-gw0-f53.google.com [74.125.83.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C477E04C7 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 09:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwb1 with SMTP id 1so2877329gwb.40 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 02:23:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5dhEM2eMLNkxR1cRoZGyZx3GA+iUti2dm92l96osK1A=; b=NpMN8GipJDWa7fPWfJFMzOBxNQ6qbL2SERKcbJjrn3BcaZJTnRvJb7isrg8xgjN40D D994T8h1dpSrMkv08QRVB80JH1PKTNr3gsPAY6AhAPZE7N54Vq0GR9tuxks05O9ohwvg gWN7mrTa4+L4WMpw6uc0pZq1CkySFwI8G7NbA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=SoQVjsecNlpn1R15wmHYPEQkdSJOolAnDj+mWt1HRrrAqV51ogV5Fosc11/Uu36PgM EC5Oef7Hf45iLMJiHPMUvuiJNrtlbi6tp0OmJIAHVAnnre0LHUSD8iXHycLohSjnhGd0 Rg9u+eT6VI43s9Cg6QQMdEcYrCsOspY1bS3EE= Received: by 10.151.107.20 with SMTP id j20mr8229490ybm.163.1287825826839; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 02:23:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (adsl-95-109-148.jan.bellsouth.net [98.95.109.148]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t23sm4975034ano.7.2010.10.23.02.23.45 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 23 Oct 2010 02:23:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CC2A99F.70507@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 04:23:43 -0500 From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.14) Gecko/20101020 Gentoo/2.0.9 SeaMonkey/2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout --> openrc ? References: <loom.20101022T040004-219@post.gmane.org> <4CC1F982.8030009@gmail.com> <20101022231349.1b4ef272@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> <201010230250.26703.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <20101023100333.221a888d@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20101023100333.221a888d@digimed.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: b95c4256-66f4-4138-b832-65eac3fb058d X-Archives-Hash: 8a5e7f73bfba6d1a7457fd58a8ea5e52 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 02:50:26 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > >>> You're mixing two different definitions of stable. Portage 2.2 is >>> certainly reliable, but it is anything but stable with a new version >>> coming out every day at the moment,. >>> > >> I'm waiting for tomorrow when my regularly scheduled portage update >> hits _rc100. >> > Well, it hasn't happened yet. A day without a portage update, a rare > thing these days. > > Maybe someone decided that Gentoo is not Debian and 99 release candidates > should be enough for a bunch of python scripts. > > Or after 99 tries, they just can't do it right and should give up. lol Dale :-) :-)