From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1P90U8-0005fW-Vs for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:07:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A7E87E07A7 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:07:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qy0-f181.google.com (mail-qy0-f181.google.com [209.85.216.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23F58E0652 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:38:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk10 with SMTP id 10so42009qyk.19 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:38:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=e1d376fSGdHTo8fCTBsy/nWGSYaJElzzBTpRwPY0DiU=; b=ISS7T4FvPKkdjKOIuJxm+lXxe7ewYvEKptklMUd3qoZ/PZJnBzjxMWYgwRfiAEp4xa OcINkJpRA/N+kVZlAnRjcPnPbUTa/iNcWheDxpxMx63cZPprg+KmKKznuzzrqHpUMr4G KHGouxOdwQR3FKl7bwd1qC8oRWTagexXThZqs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=xwgDU2KfhgWzYCZoRtJIJ0Pvh9Tb4eVCX07EdR2cyUWBR1i3erzEVKaj07cvPeb2qc gbTuDTQCVY8D1omTgwPgByVPj2fkvXPGcAqNmWhe1SUGdNh71BmtB4TbxD59Pb83Zp3a Mb70KDyH02ttqdcpoIRG5bv4lAydwCW4XBYf0= Received: by 10.229.98.209 with SMTP id r17mr1088455qcn.241.1287686306856; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:38:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (adsl-95-109-148.jan.bellsouth.net [98.95.109.148]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k15sm1694491qcu.11.2010.10.21.11.38.23 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:38:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CC0889E.1010803@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:38:22 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.14) Gecko/20101020 Gentoo/2.0.9 SeaMonkey/2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gcc upgrade: Active gcc profile is invalid! References: <4CBDD956.3090804@gmail.com> <20101019180221.GB2287@Caemlyn.diku.dk> <4CBDEA0E.5030004@gmail.com> <20101019210744.1e9947ed@digimed.co.uk> <4CC079FC.6090502@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4CC079FC.6090502@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: facfedc2-b6d7-4010-9486-7157e91c8ad6 X-Archives-Hash: 219cadbf50a688ba6a18f97d211587a5 Jarry wrote: > On 19. 10. 2010 22:07, Neil Bothwick wrote: >> On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 20:57:18 +0200, Jarry wrote: >>> Especially when I have to repeat it with my 12 gentoo servers. >>> Sequentially, unfortunatally, as they share the same hardware... >> >> Why not use --buildpkg the first time and --usepkg the other 11 times? > > They have slightly different use-flags. But I do not know if some > of them might have impact on gcc too... > > Jarry > Just do a emerge -pv gcc and see if the USE flag is listed there. If it is, then this may not work. If it is not, you should be able to use the --buildpkg feature. Dale :-) :-)