From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1P8zuQ-0003fe-PA for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:30:38 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D6E1E04EB; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:29:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f53.google.com (mail-ew0-f53.google.com [209.85.215.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B24DE04EB for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:29:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy10 with SMTP id 10so362889ewy.40 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:29:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xsHug8dNlkPiA4Cujprg06JJeFlgBqSyXxQ4KBGXrUk=; b=fKMU7V7Oz86PdPoiaUNjtAfy6cD5DEWC7xB8TS2JzhQicjIPPvbL9jzRGhU6feDKdz hZfLYPfk6ZKyOg7y7Lbgg0mv4HzF5UYNeQehwXpe0hrKuoeTwVU33qNTQ3Bq9OjoI5D5 JdR4oQt+U+HnjRRx7HKGvGk6aMHipxlx/Lsbw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=jaRbm3sfY1m/b6unNc3PreemfIgt7Au5J5Rw5d4ZkJt//zmqc1UbkEmwCkdhJ1+g6n gdFSNxHxm6wlEwCPxzTQeYnIumC0WYyV65ijeYGnatEGHeMel2oF7r8tvq2r5pHt7Org tnAGz0AIF46KtnVIrRtFW+zMCzIvtgagAI+wc= Received: by 10.213.8.143 with SMTP id h15mr2143941ebh.11.1287685754039; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:29:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (adsl-95-109-148.jan.bellsouth.net [98.95.109.148]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w20sm2105646eeh.12.2010.10.21.11.29.10 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:29:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CC08675.3060308@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:29:09 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.14) Gecko/20101020 Gentoo/2.0.9 SeaMonkey/2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Buffer overflow and nvclock terminates. References: <4CBF8A33.6080108@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 2adc7c85-7bb3-4bbc-b71a-a190e0e80be3 X-Archives-Hash: 26ac7be6821f597980aa741ce9e5c699 walt wrote: > On 10/20/2010 05:32 PM, Dale wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> While checking some things earlier today I ran into a little issue. >> It seems glibc, nvclock or something has a issue and I'm not sure >> which one it would be. System info: > >> So, is this nvclock? Is it gcc? Is it glibc? Is it something else? I >> haven't seen this with any other program so I'm thinking nvidia but >> I'm using the only version that provides nvclock in the tree. Sort of >> stuck here. > > Does nvclock require X to be running? If not, try running it from a > console. > If nvclock is an X application you could try using a different video > driver > like nv or vesa to rule out nvidia. > > I tried this in a Console, a Konsole as both root and a user. I get the same error. I also noticed there was a keyworded version of glibc that looked like the version I was running with a bug fix. I upgraded to it and still get the same error. I'm not sure what else to try since I don't know what is broke. Still open to ideas tho. Dale :-) :-)