From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1P8LnR-0004Kq-FV for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 23:40:45 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A8B10E083E; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 23:40:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-f53.google.com (mail-yw0-f53.google.com [209.85.213.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86609E083E for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 23:40:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywo7 with SMTP id 7so2845135ywo.40 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 16:40:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ziedSRLau5amGaamED/rwGV00/jfT1IqRrkmO3JRZmM=; b=mYuiVIhfKBcOOCQ+p3evaR063yjCes6QmkbbPXMu2eVjw1vTlceq0/FA4LM63Hhz+N o3Ol8LMVPOopiRvTbo88F2qIx4l8XK+izx4f7tJ7NJOONkPX8ujTC1O0EscobXyD6t7w yYu2HzYSsyn+BNPfdNeSuGzlHiu4WpB+tLMpg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=hl1OXaJKftglCXoAA2kalHMOD4bThVTG5dQ2OD/iHkQBgIkPHG4dt1UA5tj0z2y/XF llvc2cTEsV/UcdReXH2eJ1fY/bqbt6jUHaA0iJlAsHD+PE+QwRQU7Q8a22O4EK/YZ4E9 FnNSvJzEy2KbTXJi0VLd8tt8X9FojaBnUOcsU= Received: by 10.100.189.8 with SMTP id m8mr4535482anf.254.1287531623037; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 16:40:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (adsl-95-109-148.jan.bellsouth.net [98.95.109.148]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 13sm23704055anq.30.2010.10.19.16.40.21 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 19 Oct 2010 16:40:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CBE2C64.7080908@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:40:20 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.13) Gecko/20101006 Gentoo/2.0.8-r1 SeaMonkey/2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Upgrading from FX-5200 to a GeForce 6200 512MB References: <4CBD4C85.2010500@gmail.com> <4CBDFF4F.3000907@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 06c7d5ad-90b1-4ac3-81bd-bdecdaeb9589 X-Archives-Hash: ad15791971e9a188a39e20acd1306ede Paul Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Dale wrote: > >> Paul Hartman wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 2:45 AM, Dale wrote: >>> >>> >>>> I am thinking of upgrading from a FX-5200 with 128Mb video card to a >>>> GeForce >>>> 6200 with 512MB. It will be AGP since this is a older rig. My system is >>>> something like this: >>>> >>>> Mobo: Abit NF7 2.0 >>>> CPU: AMD 2500+ No overclocking >>>> Memory: 2Gbs of 333Mhz. >>>> Monitor: Gateway 19" running 1280 x 1024 >>>> >>>> >>> Based on the selection at Newegg, I would highly recommend going with >>> one of the Radeon HD 3650 or 4650 cards which only cost a little more >>> than the one you're looking at. HD3650 is going to be 5x faster than >>> GeForce 6200 and HD4650 probably 10x faster. >>> >>> I think your motherboard supports AGP 8x, and I'm not sure if there >>> are any power supply considerations or other features (number of DVI >>> heads, etc) but anyway that's my 2 cents. :) >>> >>> I am an Nvidia video card guy through and through, but in this case >>> the AGP Nvidia cards on offer there are ancient and slow compared to >>> their ATI counterparts. >>> >>> >>> >> I'm a nvidia guy. I'm not big on ATI at all. Just sort of not my cup of >> tea. I have read they have better Linux support than a long time ago but >> they came in a little to late for me. >> >> I just wish that thing had a bigger heat sink on it with fans. I may change >> that thing pretty quick. >> >> Thanks. >> > Okay then :) To return to your original question, I think going from > FX-5200 to Geforce 6200 should probably give you something like 15% > performance improvement. I don't think either card is new enough to be > supported by vdpau so there won't be anything gained there. > > 6200 uses the current drivers (260.xx) whereas the 5200 is on the > legacy drivers (173.xx), maybe there are additional 3D effects > supported by the newer chipset/drivers. There's a humongous matrix of > nvidia chipset and model numbers somewhere on the internet that > explains the differences but I can't seem to find it at the moment. My > Google-fu is failing me. :) > > > One thing I was hoping is that the newer drivers would work better. I would think they only update what they have to for new kernels and such. That is my hope. It does seem to get slower as time goes on but I'm not sure how much that is the drivers and how much that is to do with the new KDE4. I'm sure KDE4 has a good bit to do with it too. That is about the fastest card I could find that was AGP tho. I may look around and see what else I can find to tho. Dale :-) :-)