From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1P5RTx-0005Pc-Vr for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 23:08:38 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE020E05B1; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 23:08:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gx0-f181.google.com (mail-gx0-f181.google.com [209.85.161.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B66FE05B1 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 23:08:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk10 with SMTP id 10so2409768gxk.40 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 16:08:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oIt9i2LgB5uN7bkz9xMzZyHFjczeuU9TbnmjnnZ33DE=; b=pqsOQ7Z5vl39BJwHr4yhFVTvEBpCYgiCvRS159N6RF9DFGnwKnuRDS7OcfEUf2m+hW a1Vr7DSd1nFyvIw4OtfBqgX/SUWOYkKyi7fTF2uO5vY3vnFpUte3sH5v7kF9a9ot6zoc fQL805/IhgUGsYDS05fLloZ+raWzMeXJR4ViY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=cUFR4vFfmQrIchiUnl7MNC58NrjibvDG3pJLSXluTpx/Rx4o3JbYwmm8bW7G4rqfab 9OW8CqWbVXxYvUxTlHer7IP5r8kNJVsnL6j95GXhUuZWTucGwSFyeW6DjyG/8Favaohy tqdvXL05z1EBl5yE20LsyuSExddOAEs9mv6cE= Received: by 10.151.20.8 with SMTP id x8mr7409392ybi.375.1286838484242; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 16:08:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (adsl-0-120-130.jan.bellsouth.net [65.0.120.130]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r36sm3184746yba.0.2010.10.11.16.08.02 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 11 Oct 2010 16:08:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CB398D1.3090705@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:08:01 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.13) Gecko/20101006 Gentoo/2.0.8-r1 SeaMonkey/2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] "Illegal instruction" error References: <201010112239.49561.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <201010120026.48246.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <4CB39243.2000506@gentoo.org> <201010120058.21060.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201010120058.21060.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 763adeee-befc-421a-9d3e-4c818623d082 X-Archives-Hash: 0322ae9083fb1573b93564b1dbc70d36 Alan McKinnon wrote: > Apparently, though unproven, at 00:40 on Tuesday 12 October 2010, Daniel > Pielmeier did opine thusly: > > :-) > > This is what happens with modern reliable hardware - I should have gone for > the memory as the very very first step. It's been so long since I've had to > deal with dodgy memory on anything, it just didn't occur to me.... > > I was ready to start looking for weird flags using weird cpu instructions. > > Glad to know I am not the only one to miss the obvious from time to time. lol Dale :-) :-)