From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1P4EKx-0007ta-9J for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 14:54:19 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B5E4E08FA; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 14:53:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pz0-f53.google.com (mail-pz0-f53.google.com [209.85.210.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09187E08FA for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 14:53:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk1 with SMTP id 1so544118pzk.40 for ; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 07:53:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TMjmNXSo6QAsBDVeT5ClsQskMs3VUCaAEBokP9004h4=; b=YX0jABW79tKTn2YIlUWz6hJgegztMkgV6elIi+7sjHW7mrE0VO1+P5tAADIdts6uFa Y0sjTaT4D1WzhfePm7uCgA7TygE5LyVf+evdfMtk5XpCpxuHX7b9o7E0Ro3wTMr44o12 Dt0GKXVC97S2/GaSxwJf6ltVtAwQQz0/23Zvw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Zku+6z/GDZkIIgk/kx7e1XxGWqAoCmkaa2LUpEVvstgXswnqMBDUzE9+of9WgxLmq+ GCqHC0IE+p1ZHjFu1nX4vjCQiuj8woMHKgMx5jXRyMixq2B/2QxNc/cYa1RUfY0VvlJQ WmDKI2OXXQTAoMq7iXfGH/mVW68QUjiRMPW/0= Received: by 10.114.24.1 with SMTP id 1mr2840191wax.124.1286549620099; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 07:53:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (adsl-0-122-233.jan.bellsouth.net [65.0.122.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t73sm2418813yhf.6.2010.10.08.07.53.37 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 08 Oct 2010 07:53:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CAF3070.10008@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 09:53:36 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.13) Gecko/20101006 Gentoo/2.0.8-r1 SeaMonkey/2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] qt3support USE flag. Is it needed now? References: <4CAE2230.8020603@gmail.com> <4CAE465F.8090005@gmail.com> <20101008095004.0279d24e@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20101008095004.0279d24e@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: a09389e6-e0f9-4f52-8d6e-21ddde808145 X-Archives-Hash: 62312bcfcacfa490628407f21542fea6 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:14:55 -0500, Dale wrote: > > >> I may remove the USE flag and just see what blows up. I may copy over >> some binaries so that I can just use -k and not have to wait on the >> compiles. >> > That won't help. If a package needed recompiling, using a binary package > that is a copy of the existing installation won't help. Unless you mean > you are going to back up your existing binary packages before removing > the flag. > > Either way, this thread alone, never mind any recompile times, has > consumed far more of your resources that one tiny support library ever > will. > > That's what I was going to do. Copy the binaries from packages that I am currently using to a safe place then recompile. If it failed, I was going to delete the ones with the qt3support removed and but back the ones I saved that were compiled with qt3support. Dale :-) :-)