From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-115418-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1P3892-0005f4-I5
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 14:05:28 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E5E8AE0574
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue,  5 Oct 2010 14:05:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pv0-f181.google.com (mail-pv0-f181.google.com [74.125.83.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27542E07FB
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue,  5 Oct 2010 13:12:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pvg16 with SMTP id 16so3986240pvg.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 06:12:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from
         :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=dL3BMemDDxd1vhM+f4Z1VnuWXxKXou1YGTyoZzSSOTs=;
        b=KCI683d3xwuKFtMmsEFK0ZCPEltGzV+Kl2JonOGfG3OlWJefBZ8mGdzxr2V8w6D+1z
         H7imb+AZI426niIY0N1aISqzh7TFDU1tokmmd83i5lIkbsLEmEKi/Vzzdk4Z0gCSPXCc
         hPETIlkR3BfHmYU+6WAW70OFyCEcGh59ee1Ow=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=MN+PSTeflQdfyKQpZTtMY3YRNb1v5gqOZRUuKTYMYYl9iJ/sq4nYkTbzLqZa+t3RTg
         sQPw2xK3ORkKZf8P6Ob1hrVUuzTx26l9eHwvYGa5vK2YDY1PnjwppbwcrEH8kxgBrml6
         pcNYEi0BSoMDG4vsjfce21R0eGNQvxpYxewfc=
Received: by 10.114.58.18 with SMTP id g18mr1252854waa.44.1286284350596;
        Tue, 05 Oct 2010 06:12:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.25.20] (173-8-195-225-Oregon.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.8.195.225])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q6sm11398028waj.22.2010.10.05.06.12.29
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Tue, 05 Oct 2010 06:12:29 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4CAB243C.60309@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 06:12:28 -0700
From: Bill Longman <bill.longman@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100922 Lightning/1.0b3pre Lanikai/3.1.3
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: firefox-bin optimizations?
References: <AANLkTintU9mSre7WP1oYZVyqeucLGehRotrLOv1AsOxR@mail.gmail.com> <4CA47BEE.8050906@gmx.de> <AANLkTim4nshaLPaTi7fCCobB5U18EHMk1b-B2oS5wJzQ@mail.gmail.com> <i82otf$ith$1@dough.gmane.org> <20101005054908.GA22391@waltdnes.org>
In-Reply-To: <20101005054908.GA22391@waltdnes.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 0ae39f00-d9ca-4077-a701-164e2a50e12a
X-Archives-Hash: b07d8baf438775f524687d5e39f13374

On 10/04/2010 10:49 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 12:37:10PM -0700, walt wrote
>> On 09/30/2010 05:30 AM, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Johannes Kimmel<johannes.kimmel@gmx.de>  wrote:
>>>> On 09/30/2010 12:58 PM, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Heya,
>>>>> I noticed that my firefox-bin is a lot smaller in memory footprint
>>>>> compared to ordinary gentoo-compiled firefox.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does anyone know what compiler flags upstream applies to their
>>>>> firefox?
>>
>> Try entering about:buildconfig in the URL bar.
> 
>   I tried it, and for good measure, did some spelunking in the
> .configure file in the firefox tarball.  I have some questions, before
> possibly tweaking the Firefox ebuild and/or .configure on my machine...
> 
> --enable-application=xulrunner
> will Firefox run without this?

It definitely WON'T run without this. Unless you're only looking at the
intertubes as seen 15 years ago...