From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-115233-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1P1Hq2-0000Aa-5W
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:02:17 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 87D25E0786;
	Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:01:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 16F97E0786
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:01:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 30 Sep 2010 12:01:17 -0000
Received: from p5DDE49F3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.178.22]) [93.222.73.243]
  by mail.gmx.net (mp021) with SMTP; 30 Sep 2010 14:01:17 +0200
X-Authenticated: #17302818
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/CsCBuEGnCtMxM/W15GfKas4tndvjnepGFEpfBm0
	nRP3x7LhMw+3lT
Message-ID: <4CA47BEE.8050906@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:00:46 +0200
From: Johannes Kimmel <johannes.kimmel@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100926 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.4
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] firefox-bin optimizations?
References: <AANLkTintU9mSre7WP1oYZVyqeucLGehRotrLOv1AsOxR@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTintU9mSre7WP1oYZVyqeucLGehRotrLOv1AsOxR@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-Archives-Salt: e3e7e686-db3c-43b1-9c84-3b02b31077f6
X-Archives-Hash: ea929ef3dae46cb97e5bf0ed022dce3f

On 09/30/2010 12:58 PM, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
> Heya,
> I noticed that my firefox-bin is a lot smaller in memory footprint
> compared to ordinary gentoo-compiled firefox.
>
> Does anyone know what compiler flags upstream applies to their
> firefox? I turned off the custom-optimization USE on mine assuming
> that it would follow upstream optimizations, but maybe it doesn't.
>

I thought firefox-bin is a 32-bit binary. If you are using a 64-bit 
gentoo it is likely you self compiled version is a lot bigger.

Regards

Johannes Kimmel