From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ou6i2-0005Jr-SN for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:44:19 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 09C3BE0822; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:43:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9DC3E0822 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:43:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.41]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD8D153; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:43:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:43:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=messagingengine.com; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; s=smtpout; bh=w7IuZKLONo7eVAid3sw6DYnh7UM=; b=aiFNXpE+YlROGrYgDpY0n5U0iMPxdMsh4fINc20k4CC8l+B/VTBO1URoQTY731VdGu1JO1TH18OwS6Ct6AD+ootqe2yD64p6aZpYo0NAEP+SlcI2usKxNqHKEUUNf8XoIstgpXodH4fESZHARtD+/oZi7W7r5ffGONuNVd9zPsU= X-Sasl-enc: PS+TYjRyIG/k6TZVNTHOvon4iEd8tU25ag1tRZe3ER12 1284137023 Received: from [192.168.5.18] (lvps83-169-5-6.dedicated.hosteurope.de [83.169.5.6]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 673BD409754 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:43:43 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4C8A6034.2040908@f_philipp.fastmail.net> Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 18:43:32 +0200 From: Florian Philipp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100808 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.1.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Shared libraries in Gentoo References: <201009072320.54829.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <20100909005654.GA15206@nibiru.local> <201009091056.39057.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <20100909234911.GA8209@nibiru.local> In-Reply-To: <20100909234911.GA8209@nibiru.local> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig234B37E7B5F04882AC84BBF9" X-Archives-Salt: 9e2c0e79-04f6-4b4c-85e1-74df65c2493f X-Archives-Hash: 31d5fd11b702583dae9728072df32755 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig234B37E7B5F04882AC84BBF9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 10.09.2010 01:49, schrieb Enrico Weigelt: > * Alan McKinnon wrote: >=20 >>> But I'd really like to know what produces the performance hits >>> on Posfix @ Linux. >> >> It comes down to the IO scheduler. Linux is designed to be general pur= pose.=20 >> FreeBSD is designed to be much more specific. >=20 > hmm, Linux provides several io schedulers - does choosing another > one help here ? >=20 And if it's so good for certain workloads, why hasn't FreeBSD's scheduler been ported to Linux? Or is the whole software stack (block devices etc.) so completely different that it wouldn't work? --------------enig234B37E7B5F04882AC84BBF9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkyKYDsACgkQqs4uOUlOuU8mOwCfUkZY5JAjCPvC9xB3+3P3ZYCD gN4Anj7DPYsslR7S89f2uZ8LjyFoQuqY =q74j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig234B37E7B5F04882AC84BBF9--