From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Otf3i-0007nU-VI for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 11:12:51 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 241F0E089A; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:12:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp209.alice.it (smtp209.alice.it [82.57.200.105]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCAD4E089A for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:12:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from infra.agr.fm (79.6.117.34) by smtp209.alice.it (8.5.124.08) id 4C1A275904E9F87A for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 13:12:07 +0200 Received: from [192.168.64.9] (silver.agr.fm [192.168.64.9]) by infra.agr.fm (Postfix) with ESMTP id 804795DD11F for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 13:12:07 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4C88C107.4030708@alyf.net> Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 13:12:07 +0200 From: Andrea Conti User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100825 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.3 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Shared libraries in Gentoo References: <201009071840.12491.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <201009072320.54829.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <20100909023616.GB15206@nibiru.local> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 982b0684-dc2e-4bee-aac8-94387121efe3 X-Archives-Hash: 072fe3e32ec8888ad728011427acff29 > I still try to understand the relation of shared libraries and dynamic > libraries. I read that dynamic libraries are linked at runtime. I also > read, that you can dynamically link againgst a shared as well as > against a normal library. Pardon me, but in my opinion if you're asking this kind of questions, porting the Gentoo build system (or even any non-trivial application without upstream support) to a different and basically unsupported environment is way beyond what you can manage with your current level of technical expertise. In other words, this is not the kind of thing you can solve by iteratively trying to build, look at what breaks and doing a point fix. I am not saying it can't be done, but porting is hard and requires an in-depth knowledge of the source and the target environment, plus a lot of development experience in both. You should begin with that, instead of diving head-first into what is all but a simple task. just my =800.02, andrea