From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OlicY-0006Ml-M8 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:23:58 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E227DE08D1; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:22:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.informasoftware.com (173.221.47.101.nw.nuvox.net [173.221.47.101]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE87E08D1 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:22:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.100.48] ([192.168.100.48] RDNS failed) by mail.informasoftware.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:22:55 -0400 Message-ID: <4C6BDEAE.7090707@kutulu.org> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:22:54 -0400 From: Mike Edenfield User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org CC: Enrico Weigelt Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] how to remove HAL References: <20100728090511.59fecb92@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> <20100817194922.GB6494@nibiru.local> In-Reply-To: <20100817194922.GB6494@nibiru.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Aug 2010 13:22:55.0028 (UTC) FILETIME=[7794A740:01CB3ED8] X-Archives-Salt: c199ac3f-f42d-4a71-acb7-2517fe9de3c8 X-Archives-Hash: 4f1ef2255df22235d98b240615cbe9d5 On 8/17/2010 3:49 PM, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > * Neil Bothwick wrote: > >> USE only affects optional dependencies. euse -I hal will list packages >> that have a hal USE flag while emerge --depclean -pv sys-apps/hal will >> show those that depend o it. > > I've just experimented a bit with that and it turned out that > --depclean doesn't clean up the buildtime-only deps. But if I > remove one of them (eg. cabextract), they don't get pulled in again > (that's indicating the depending ebuilds are written properly). > > Is this a bug ? --depclean is supposed to pull in build-time dependencies, unless you specify "--with-bdeps n". So if that's not happening, then I'd say it is a bug.