From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OlAx5-0001P5-Rc for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 01:26:56 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5C9C1E0908; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 01:26:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pz0-f53.google.com (mail-pz0-f53.google.com [209.85.210.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D79BE0908 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 01:26:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk9 with SMTP id 9so2994216pzk.40 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:26:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type; bh=+Auqdl+oxCa0931Vb21cD+aV4jEbUWjk31+/ACXSv4U=; b=jDEY1RY3eNdloTUSn1qxwU8M45pVXVAniG18b4gzMdCbY9jPxLr9EzAEla9WSP5+1Z 4r3ABHUc5x0g9nTzDxHVlZB5lSLeWv9U2pg65yN2LHn6gSOr4/VBon/OkoqX7opa3MOq iYjyyX+FDVODwMSGSzfOajSqeHjBeXm/bcM+4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type; b=mg6F1KHSnxib6y/t3Kh8dzJox1xY8m7VFPUtPObrTFBT81NGgC5hqZooLFaDacZE9W JoVaHUuaZNqhxC/iNThqwHZIQ9cnEcdLT3HUcZq/1dKhYw5JWLyVJXcLpQf64ibx7qy4 NXYUT8JwMyQJMEC0UsKDnV8OryRShUCgVZWHE= Received: by 10.142.241.7 with SMTP id o7mr25819wfh.72.1282008392693; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:26:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.110] (cpe-76-93-116-213.socal.res.rr.com [76.93.116.213]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g5sm9009903wfd.7.2010.08.16.18.26.30 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:26:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C69E545.6080800@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:26:29 -0700 From: Andy Wilkinson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100727 Thunderbird/3.1.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] >=www-client/chromium-6.0.472.33 and h264 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020107050101040707030700" X-Archives-Salt: 7d1722ca-43d3-49e4-9672-466d6f5adaac X-Archives-Hash: dc1614fa997ef0ba770819b6207bd23b This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020107050101040707030700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I've noticed that ebuilds of chromium at and later than 6.0.472.33 no longer use the system-provided ffmpeg, and seem to lose support for h264 videos (test any non-webm, html5 video at youtube; it will never load). I've tried doctoring the ebuild to use the system-provided ffmpeg, which does not fix h264 video and causes crashes on webm videos: probably why we went back to the bundled ffmpeg. Has anyone else noticed this? Is there a straightforward work-around beyond going back to 6.0.472.14ish? Thanks, -Andy --------------020107050101040707030700 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've noticed that ebuilds of chromium at and later than 6.0.472.33 no longer use the system-provided ffmpeg, and seem to lose support for h264 videos (test any non-webm, html5 video at youtube; it will never load).

I've tried doctoring the ebuild to use the system-provided ffmpeg, which does not fix h264 video and causes crashes on webm videos: probably why we went back to the bundled ffmpeg.

Has anyone else noticed this?=C2=A0 Is there a straightforward work-around beyond going back to 6.0.472.14ish?

Thanks,

-Andy
 --------------020107050101040707030700--