From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OfE4Q-0004OO-DD for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 15:33:55 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3A507E0894; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 15:33:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gy0-f181.google.com (mail-gy0-f181.google.com [209.85.160.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CEF9E0894 for ; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 15:33:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyf1 with SMTP id 1so1378660gyf.40 for ; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 08:33:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WqZ4+iZqaSCnAvcMTZ3YpXPC6MGNkSVN5FGFGDdgjFk=; b=A2sB6o0D0LeKUgrTDMs+M/5soVAczOUOypcOKnKqM+HI9mstDup0vxiTmFUSNcRmZ4 7rDUYTLTWfFpAPaqaVblDlKfgpd6bE1xuc5zj4Z6Jeo6h9Iqxre7gPx1y++6++LAuJDm gdK1GUvvNdgWxj/jsOcULSALZMXRA/HCRhCTA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pbC0VzrYoVNZvmsdWUrzFeOs4vpQbdpHCogo3zLG6ZM5nM7littTv3J8sPJyVkRDLh oqVF6JOEVL5ELMzNeFOA42dfAY2oRuhu/SMGqgPk7HO/Gv9FxVBm3T1sf593Fs5U48M7 fLQjh/MP1X+747eWMGdP4KrrZcmg2loYMjdwg= Received: by 10.101.183.16 with SMTP id k16mr3944970anp.120.1280590401456; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 08:33:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (adsl-240-55-50.jan.bellsouth.net [74.240.55.50]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l6sm5805111ang.38.2010.07.31.08.33.19 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 31 Jul 2010 08:33:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C54423E.2020208@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 10:33:18 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100721 Gentoo/2.0.6 SeaMonkey/2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] OT: hard disk access and recovery impossible under linux ? References: <20100731152732.4da6f3d1@matrix.inten.pl> <201007311615.51276.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> <20100731165719.6832246c@matrix.inten.pl> In-Reply-To: <20100731165719.6832246c@matrix.inten.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 38b4db55-ca1c-4123-adb5-175091e356d1 X-Archives-Hash: 539b891042263c20203f33fa6789be50 Kacper Kopczy=C5=84ski wrote: > Dnia 2010-07-31, o godz. 16:15:51 > Volker Armin Hemmann napisa=C5=82(a): > > =20 >> On Samstag 31 Juli 2010, Kacper Kopczy=C5=84ski wrote: >> =20 >>> Hi, >>> >>> My problem is really strange - I can't access my hard drive from >>> linux, but it works from windows without problems. It has some bad >>> blocks. >>> =20 >> it has a lot of bad blocks and a fucked up firmware it seems. No way >> it is working 'without problems'. >> >> =20 > Well total space taken by bad blocks according to chkdsk is less than > 1MB, windows is still able to access all data. Linux is only able to > see partition table "for a while" - as you can see in dmesg. > > If firmware is broken then how it is possible that windows is able to > use this disk? > > =20 Maybe windoze is ignoring the problem? It's not like windoze has never=20 done that before right? Just a thought. Dale :-) :-)