From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OUWyE-0007Yf-Ha for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 03:31:18 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8012AE0B70; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 03:30:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gw0-f53.google.com (mail-gw0-f53.google.com [74.125.83.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 541AAE0B70 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 03:30:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwb19 with SMTP id 19so1614201gwb.40 for ; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 20:30:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fEbQHorLP8nM8Sune9OflRQMDSBqjO6ja9Fue0IO654=; b=TXKZaTh5Qk6yajfWkLt63yD7t19sizB4V8PeYK4C4icKYzBde0/xH6vmrBVsom3QVo 5Wv43zblNCrlZ6GwKIBPZTYW6ROcx3GClbP/6mOL6r1HN3wdZUXlQaJVOKgXigyOwBxM lA2QSnr/GS/YDsScZAYALO6N+k9My0DGyL/D4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=I+3eIsTFH8HUkd3JJtCirvP/M1HQDweBSYWevEAy/mi1WWD46IQR28cFjNtbE7AHCD 0Q/SiVeoXsNIjcUEai4k61+DV48XY3zzGjpoCAARFQ9/pOAGgpwjvg8VFiurtwcUipgi w8ZmDb+COY+ojXuXv0J+hO3VyGfMy8kmP+i6c= Received: by 10.90.88.7 with SMTP id l7mr459171agb.180.1278041439918; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 20:30:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (adsl-95-150-225.jan.bellsouth.net [98.95.150.225]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t2sm465887yba.2.2010.07.01.20.30.38 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 01 Jul 2010 20:30:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C2D5D5D.6010109@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 22:30:37 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100630 Gentoo/2.0.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Mailing list policy on reply References: <20100702005433.GK9344@vidovic> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: fe8394db-4e1f-4f42-b565-943c18df58d1 X-Archives-Hash: 43935899829f6b934a34ebcafd4afb8f Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2010-07-02, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > > >> I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing >> the 'Reply-To' header to the mailing list address. Most mailing >> lists I use don't do that. >> >> It is usually better and prefer the "answer to all" policy as it >> permit to be notified of an answer without having to track the whole >> mailing list. >> >> What do you think about changing of policy? >> > I'd rather not get replies sent directly to my address, so I prefer it > the way it is. > > +1 When they start a new list and it is not set up this way, it causes confusion. This was discussed before on another list. I don't see this changing anytime soon and hope it doesn't. Dale :-) :-)