From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OOA5N-0003nv-3s for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 13:52:21 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B7ACE089C; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 13:51:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blingymail-a3.g.dreamhost.com (caibbdcaaaaf.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.5]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 189E8E089C for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 13:51:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.110] (smtp.media-brokers.com [70.43.81.99]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by blingymail-a3.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F32814D761 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 06:51:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C1633EC.6000309@libertytrek.org> Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:51:40 -0400 From: Tanstaafl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Anything better than procmail? References: <20100613233744.4ed3d923@karnak.local> <4C160F5F.5050807@libertytrek.org> <20100614140909.3d0dddd9@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20100614140909.3d0dddd9@digimed.co.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ffdb68e9-4b58-4f58-8413-435c56b705d4 X-Archives-Hash: 1da8a724debfddcc7d957daa36083d76 On 2010-06-14 9:09 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 07:15:43 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: > >> That said... does anyone know of a repo that provides good quality >> up to date builds of dovecot - maybe even including the 2.0 betas? > How about the portage tree, which goes up to 2.0 bets 5? Cool... I didn't check before posting, but I do remember that it lagged quite a bit at one time not too long ago. Glad to see it is mostly keeping up (beta6 was only released a few days ago, so no surprise it isn't there yet). Thanks Neil...