From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OMOUM-0007OM-Kh for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 16:50:50 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ACBD4E0857; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 16:50:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blingymail-a3.g.dreamhost.com (caibbdcaaaaf.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.5]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D82E0857 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 16:50:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.110] (smtp.media-brokers.com [70.43.81.99]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by blingymail-a3.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEAB014D775 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 09:50:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C0FC643.5080002@libertytrek.org> Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 12:50:11 -0400 From: Tanstaafl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Strange python-updater error References: <4C0F6DA5.8040105@numericable.fr> <4C0FAE81.5090006@gmail.com> <4C0FB220.4090107@libertytrek.org> <201006091821.20489.wonko@wonkology.org> <20100609172810.21a70885@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20100609172810.21a70885@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 9396223a-bdf1-4c64-8b2d-1f5a6c0eb87c X-Archives-Hash: 14ae7c715ce46b8a71d8b0d8da9ab72c On 2010-06-09 12:28 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 18:21:17 +0200, Alex Schuster wrote: >>> I'm guessing it won't hurt anything, again as long as I don't >>> stupidly switch to it? >> Right. > And if a script specifically wants Python 3, it is there for it to > use. Cool, thanks guys...