public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Stefan G. Weichinger" <lists@xunil.at>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Kernel upgrade and now LUKS failure.
Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 20:38:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BE30CB2.4020307@xunil.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BE2ED48.4090006@admin-box.com>

Am 06.05.2010 18:24, schrieb Daniel Troeder:
> On 05/05/2010 10:23 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>> Am 05.05.2010 22:17, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>>
>>> Remember that I said: "I am not sure which HOWTO I followed" ?
>>>
>>> What if I didn't use aes-256-ecb?
> You don't need to supplay that information to cryptsetup, it can
> (should) autodetect it. To see that info for yourself run:
> $ cryptsetup luksDump /dev/mapper/VG01-crypthome

But I always did when I followed your example.
Anyway, this part is solved now.

>> Yep. See pam_mount.conf.xml:
>> It's "aes-256-cbc" in my case.
>>
>> I was now able to luksOpen and I have the decrypted device mounted.
> Hooray :)

Yes :-)

Currently I run an unencrypted home on another LV.

>> Nice.
>>
>> So:
>>
>> the user-pw didn't change and the keyfile is OK.
>>
>> So why is pam_mount unable to mount it?
>>
>> I will now pull another backup and check/add fallback keys ;-)
> There are interesting options in the cryptsetup-man page:
> luksHeaderBackup and luksHeaderRestore... I think I'll add that to my
> backup scripts :)

Good idea.

The main question is still unanswered: Why does pam_mount not work
anymore with the given device/key ?

Should I file a bug?

S



  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-06 18:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-03 16:56 [gentoo-user] Kernel upgrade and now LUKS failure Jason Dusek
2010-05-03 17:31 ` Florian Philipp
2010-05-04 10:06 ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2010-05-04 16:54   ` [gentoo-user] " walt
2010-05-04 17:38     ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2010-05-04 19:28       ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2010-05-04 21:24         ` Daniel Troeder
2010-05-05  4:42           ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2010-05-05  8:00             ` Daniel Troeder
2010-05-05  8:42               ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2010-05-05 19:39                 ` Daniel Troeder
2010-05-05 20:17                   ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2010-05-05 20:23                     ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2010-05-06 16:24                       ` Daniel Troeder
2010-05-06 18:38                         ` Stefan G. Weichinger [this message]
2010-05-07  8:53                           ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2010-05-07 14:24                             ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2010-05-07 21:14                               ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2010-05-10 16:48                                 ` Daniel Troeder
2010-05-04 23:51       ` walt
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-05-16 12:36 Jan Engelhardt
2010-05-17  9:14 ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2010-05-17 21:01   ` Daniel Troeder
2010-05-18 13:05   ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-05-18 13:44     ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2010-05-18 16:04       ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-05-18 16:56         ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2010-05-18 17:57           ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-05-18 18:57             ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2010-05-18 19:33               ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2010-05-18 20:06                 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-05-18 20:17                   ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2010-05-18 21:16                     ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-05-18 21:49                       ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2010-05-18 22:23                         ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-05-20 10:25                           ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2010-05-20 13:40                             ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2010-05-18 19:38               ` Eray Aslan
2010-05-21 20:24             ` Daniel Troeder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BE30CB2.4020307@xunil.at \
    --to=lists@xunil.at \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox