From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1O5pIR-0001S3-2a for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 00:02:03 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 405D9E0783; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 00:00:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pw0-f53.google.com (mail-pw0-f53.google.com [209.85.160.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D67BE0783 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 00:00:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pwj10 with SMTP id 10so6691884pwj.40 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 17:00:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cBfxO17jDiDyFH89N27WlQdm5Wov5IxMMl80NFn4W8g=; b=u7Qds1RHaH4AmJgAmB+dqtHIRymrlFs39qzRFiyEBXvY/fpqGBYJEfV2sNd3vwDj4d tQ/GmWE/9m4UDnBOzKHA7kk97Dp4VY4rL8RD7N8xYDGytlZ95b8XQkHIfsLUCZXv124F 5PjHxGx6gN0azldNCKvCd2DoFLQ2/Mg/OLDK8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=S8u8J+K4PBoivMf6Tbk77BVEkdxmPexlPBaztNJakF/UhzJ3U8+y2PaSa5VMyQm664 HPaQzLjIkYLhaLVjOHMoexPJe0YT6j09S4ht0RPAq7HfrIDRSFugs+d7FxnJ7tQAYzEZ i8aDzu/1iaWU0BKjcGqkAKh1R3AmmYMoukIuI= Received: by 10.115.148.18 with SMTP id a18mr2136092wao.229.1272153645489; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 17:00:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([120.17.249.229]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b6sm12531589wam.21.2010.04.24.17.00.43 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 24 Apr 2010 17:00:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BD3865A.1060203@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 08:01:30 +0800 From: ubiquitous1980 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100409 Thunderbird/3.0.3 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] hplip recompiled with scanner use flag now scanning works, printing does not. References: <4BCBA8EF.2070007@gmail.com> <4BD192D4.5020602@gmail.com> <4BD1C983.2010104@gmail.com> <201004240122.46910.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> <4BD24D1D.3000806@gmail.com> <4BD2528B.3070208@gentoo.org> <4BD281C8.2080401@gmail.com> <4BD2B819.8010103@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4BD2B819.8010103@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 9d1f2af4-2cb7-431e-8c41-27fc841bef4e X-Archives-Hash: 9828157a10192d5e787092bd50ba6b25 Daniel, I have found the line which is at fault in xx-libsane.rules. Problem is, what we are doing is a work around: # Hewlett-Packard Photosmart C5100 series ATTRS{idVendor}=="03f0", ATTRS{idProduct}=="5811", MODE="0664", GROUP="lp", ENV$ I have changed the group to lp from scanner so that I could maintain the file number. Problem is, if we have MODE="0664", those in the scanner group should be able to access the printer. Do you think this suggests a deeper bug? I created a testfile in my home directory with stickybits set to 0664. I then set ownership to root:scanner. Of course, I could edit the file, as I am in the scanner group. This makes me wonder why the rules did not apply in /dev/bus/usb/005/005 when this file was set to 0664 and group to scanner. I know for sure that the group was scanner, but I cannot be sure that the file was truly set to 0664. For now I have the intra-config file workaround. I will see if I can mess with things a bit to get things working. Thanks ubiquitous1980