From: Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@libertytrek.org>
To: gentoo-user <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: [gentoo-user] iptables - do I need the nat table?
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 18:17:13 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BC0F8E9.3020103@libertytrek.org> (raw)
Hello,
This is on a server box, and I am *not* doing NAT on it...
Do I even need the nat table? If not, I'd like to build the kernel
without NAT support, but if there's a good reason not to do that, I won't...
Thanks
--
Charles
next reply other threads:[~2010-04-10 22:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-10 22:17 Tanstaafl [this message]
2010-04-11 2:26 ` [gentoo-user] Re: iptables - do I need the nat table? Kerin Millar
2010-04-11 10:46 ` Tanstaafl
2010-04-11 13:20 ` Graham Murray
2010-04-12 12:31 ` Tanstaafl
2010-04-12 17:21 ` stosss
2010-04-15 18:25 ` Mick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BC0F8E9.3020103@libertytrek.org \
--to=tanstaafl@libertytrek.org \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox