From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1O0gtl-0001A3-5x for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 20:03:21 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5BC97E0894; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 20:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blingymail-a1.g.dreamhost.com (caibbdcaaaaf.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.5]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B022E0894 for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 20:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.110] (smtp.media-brokers.com [70.43.81.99]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by blingymail-a1.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8411B5C81B for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:02:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BC0D965.6020000@libertytrek.org> Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 16:02:45 -0400 From: Tanstaafl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081209 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] Strange ReiserFS errors in logs... X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 9990b8e8-36cd-407c-9f42-142d630b82a7 X-Archives-Hash: 67b115cfa11ba573ecdfc638a39364cb I was doing some updates and getting ready for my gcc switch, and in the process saw these two errors pop-up in the logs: Apr 10 15:31:10 myhost kernel: ReiserFS: dm-1: warning: vs-8115: get_num_ver: not directory or indirect item Apr 10 15:31:10 myhost kernel: ReiserFS: dm-1: warning: vs-8115: get_num_ver: not directory or indirect item This is on a 2.6.23 kernel (and one of the things I'm doing this weekend is upgrading that). I've never seen them before, and its been over a half hour and there haven't been any since. I grepped past logs, and didn't find any there either. I did find a number of threads about this being a harmless error, but those were all back in 2004/2005... Anyone seen this recently, and knowns what it means, and whether or not I should be concerned? Thanks, -- Charles